Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JMAR Technologies(JMAR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilberry who wrote (7896)	5/4/1999 6:07:00 PM
From: MJCok	Respond to of 9695

Bilberry; You are correct in that much funding did come from the Government, but not all by a long shot. This is easily seen from the 10k's and 10q's. JMAR has spent significant amounts of their own monies. We hope to see the ROI now. MJ

To: Bilberry who wrote (7896)	5/4/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: henry jakala	Respond to of 9695

vcall was great - recent writeups are great - but ..... earnings are soon to be reported and market makers/"some entity" are/is intent on keeping the stock down - market makers may use the poor earnings excuse to take us down market makers don't care about what JMAR does - their only intention is to make their short positions pay off i'm hoping earnings won't be too drastically affected this Q due to all the new hires and their compensation packages whatever they may be

To: Bilberry who wrote (7896)	5/5/1999 1:51:00 PM
From: Gooch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9695

Bilberry, the point I am trying to make is that in ten years JMAR has not once delivered on promises. The only indication we have of future performance is past performance. Let's talk about the present and not the past. In late January, here is how they described their new BL-1001: .....excellent commercial potential .....perfectly suited for a variety of manufacturing uses .....ideal for research and development applications .....ideally suited for a wide range of scientific and material processing applications .....ideally suited for a range of high throughput material processing applications Since they couldn't sell any of them, they talk as if it is as useless as a screen door on a submarine. They're "not aggressively pushing it --- power too low." In January they could get from one to one hundred watts. Martinez is already hedging on the 2000 delivery of the XRL - said it would be ready a year from now - financing permitting. We all want JMAR to deliver and become hugely successful, but everything they predict has to be taken with a grain of salt. Their ability to deliver has to be questioned and is not a certainty. Based upon their predictions, you've known for a fact that each of the last several years was to be " the year"!!!!!