SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (45828)5/5/1999 9:57:00 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 67261
 
The liar didn't even say sorry. He's just not contesting a law suit by the owner of the asparin factory to get $24 Million unfrozen by the US.

The liar isn't contesting this just like he didn't contest the contempt citation, didn't contest the rape accusation, etc. etc. etc.

Being a psychopath means never having to say you're sorry, because you never are.



To: greenspirit who wrote (45828)5/5/1999 10:02:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
I know how the press reacted when an Iranian civil airliner was shot down by the U.S. On course, on schedule, listening to the right atc frequencies. That famous bastion of the "liberal" press, the NYT, had an editorial basicly saying what a good idea it was. The on course, on schedule, listening to the right atc frequencies business took a while to come out, of course. But the Reaganauts wouldn't lie, would they?

I also know how the Bush administration reacted when Saddam sent a stray missile or 2 at a U.S. warship. That was cool, too. Strange how Saddam got the wrong idea how we'd react later, but there were somewhat more proximate reasons for him getting the wrong idea.



To: greenspirit who wrote (45828)5/5/1999 1:12:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Can you imagine how the press would have reacted if this had been Ronald Reagan's bombs?

Oh man, don't get me started!