Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (16108)	5/5/1999 10:07:00 AM
From: George D	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19331

FAMH put out releases claiming large revenues and also claimed they were making a profit. In reality they had little revenue and were loosing money. They also had weekly conference calls saying they were doing all sorts of great things, none of it true. Hopefully this is not the situation with DCTC.

To: tonto who wrote (16108)	5/5/1999 10:13:00 AM
From: Ken Salaets	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19331

I'm equally curious as to your motivation in posting here. I can't recall if you have posted in the past, and your profile indicates a May 3 initiation. Granted, you appear to be fairly active on SI, and there also appears to be a fairly consistent pattern relative to the input that you provide. Can you point me to your earlier remarks on the DCI thread? I, too, like to fancy myself as an "investigative reporter," although I am not interested in carrying a press pass about or anything of that nature. EDIT: And I have an inborn suspicion of investigative reporters and lawyers. Ken

To: tonto who wrote (16108)	5/5/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: C	Respond to of 19331

tonto, FAMH and Ira whats-his-name cannot remind anyone of DCI. The stories are not even similar. That hard look at their own company that you mentioned has already been done here. <<It wasn't until many months later the group finally took a hard look at their own company. They did not like what they learned and have brought suit against the company seeking receivership.>> C

To: tonto who wrote (16108)	5/5/1999 10:27:00 AM
From: Gary1046	Respond to of 19331

Tonto, In all fairness, you come on to this thread with the most sincerest of our interests in mind, but I notice you seem to gravitate toward stocks that are having some difficulty. If I recall correctly, you are a shorter of different stocks from time to time. Your appearance on this thread at this time leads me to believe that you have some ulterior motive. What would even make you acknowledge this company? Compassion, I doubt it. You seem to point out anything negative that could happen and your comparisons with other stocks not even near DCTCs category are absurd. Please state your case for your opinions please. Thanks. Gary