Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Haber Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: coolhandluke who wrote (580)	5/7/1999 8:11:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 817

I think you should of read these S.I. posts a month back...Greenie Issues: techstocks.com Subject: ECHARTERS To: John Ripley From: E. Charters Apr 3 1999 5:20AM EST Reply #3101 of 3139 Well kids, now let's tell the truth. Within a few days, free cyanide in water is completely destroyed by natural ultraviolet light. Where iron and copper are present, as is often the case in nature, cyanide readily forms harmless compounds with these metals. As a matter of fact, mill managers have the hardest time to keep free cyanide "alive" because of the ubiquitous cyanide "poisons" that destroy it. There are many commercial processes that easily dispose of cyanide safely and completely, two of them in use are the Hydrogen Peroxide and Chlorine processes. After chlorination of water in the parts per million, cyanide is 100% destroyed. Further, if the Ph of the water is brought below 6.5, which is easily achievable, it is again impossible to retain cyanide in aqueous solution. Cyanide in the environment, as we know in Canada after 100 years of gold mining is a complete non- issue. There is not one lake polluted with cyanide, nor one lake's fish stocks depleted because of its use. Believe me, I have lived in about 6 communities that have used more of that chemical than all the mines in the States have so far and have personal knowledge of this. The document on this website is full of propaganda and half truths. Summitville has zero problem with cyanide. Its problem, which is natural and precedes the mining of the site by perhaps 100 million years, is copper leaching from the rock in the mountain. God put the river and the copper there, so complain to him. If you want the correct information on cyanide and its environmental controls contact the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada and ask for the relevant specialist. This is a government branch that deals with mining in Ontario and I doubt that they will give out any data that is in danger of rebuke from knowledgeable authority. EC<:-} techstocks.com To: +richard badauskas (3121 ) From: +E. Charters Monday, Apr 12 1999 2:56PM ET Reply # of 3139 There is no major problem with acid mine water discharge from sulphide mines in Canada that I know of. I can think of no river or Lake which is terribly damaged from acid mine wastes or tailings pond wastes. I could be wrong here as I have not given it much in depth study and I am going on having lived near mines most of my life in many areas of Canada. Even in the Sudbury area you would expect that the lakes in the area would be laid waste by tailings drainage but this is not the case. The damage there was caused by ancient smelters putting sulfur dioxide gases into the air. This can now be recovered almost 100% by catalytic conversion. Some Iron oxide mines had a real problem with acid tails. One could lime the tails and prevent the metals from staying in solution. This was not always done. I have access to a technology that can recover 100% of the dissolved metals from mine waters at pennies per ton. As a matter of fact it can desalinate water cheaper than any other method. It is brand new technology and as far as I know not in place at any mines. De-cyanidation could be achieved by this method too. It is very exciting tech as it promises to be able to clean up and permit many situations to a higher standard and much cheaper than previously thought possible. EC<:-} techstocks.com Subject: ECHARTERS To: richard badauskas From: E. Charters Apr 13 1999 3:40PM EST Reply #3124 of 3139 Ok boy, who are you? Oh sire, I get my id.. in my backpocket her sire.. jes aminute GUN!!! BLAM ITTY BLAM BAM KAPOW POW BLAM BANGITTY BANG KAPOW BANG BANG BANG BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAMITTY BLAM KAPOW. oh maybe that wasn't a gun.. looks like a black and red wallet. could a sworn it was a gun.. why would he pull a gun on five cops? he couldn't hope to beat them all... well some guys is jes crazy... ( What he means is...why question authority...as he knows what he speaks ..in Canada.) Message 8979432 Message 8979432 ......<<... This is a slap in the face to all those citizens who believed and participated in the Lands for Life initiative, and especially those who were members of the "round tables" who thought they would finally make a difference on how government would work to the benefit of all. Minister Hodgson said in his April letter, "we could go back to the old system of land-use planning used by the Liberals and NDP, in which government imposes new land use restrictions on you, and you'll have to learn to live with it. But that is not right." If Chris Hodgson is a man of principle and stands behind what he says, he should immediately withdraw his support for Ontario's Living Legacy, and resign his position as minister of northern development and mines in protest, because he knows Ontario's Living Legacy "is not right ...>> Last part above only ( 10% ) click to read the 90 %. Chuca PS- NO position, hold all loosers at a monent - so when it increases ...sell to mitigate thous' loss.