Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Infowave Wireless Messaging IW:TSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: axial who wrote (538)	5/5/1999 11:36:00 PM
From: SirVinny	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1690

Subject 27996

To: axial who wrote (538)	5/5/1999 11:42:00 PM
From: Robert Dydo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1690

His comments are supporting double role of Yorkton Securities. They short the stock and they losing so Pavan is trying to make the shares stay down.

To: axial who wrote (538)	5/6/1999 1:02:00 AM
From: Ritch D	Respond to of 1690

Hey jaskay....you have it dead right... As IWM gains in share price, and becomes more of a playground for daytraders, shorts, etc., we're going to see a lot of remarks on this thread that can have negative effects on those whose money is on the line, and who (rightly) believe that they've made a good investment. ...just remember the posters before this happens...and if they change their identity try to identify thru other buddies who they really are... did you read the '9 scam warnings from StockHouse.com? Ritch

To: axial who wrote (538)	5/6/1999 5:18:00 AM
From: Tom Gordon	Respond to of 1690

Who's word should we accept?Yorkton's silver tongued SOB, or North America's most respected tech analyst, Andrew Seybold.?????????????/