Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rhino Ray who wrote (15124)	5/5/1999 11:51:00 PM
From: dennis michael patterson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41369

I don't know if Merrill raised their estimates. As for AOL and new highs, I certainly would LOVE to see that!

To: Rhino Ray who wrote (15124)	5/5/1999 11:59:00 PM
From: gridiron 99	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 41369

According to this article which was released tonight, Merill Lynch is still very positive about AOL. I don't know where that rumor came from. Technology News Wed, 05 May 1999, 11:40pm EDT Merrill Lynch's Blodget on America Online: Company Comment By Aimee Picchi New York, May 5 (Bloomberg) -- The following are comments from Merrill Lynch & Co. analyst Henry Blodget about America Online Inc.'s plans to offer high-speed Internet access to its subscribers. Blodget hosted a conference call earlier today with AOL President Bob Pittman about the No. 1 online service 's high- speed Internet strategy. AOL decided earlier this week not to pair up with Comcast Corp. to bid for cable-TV operator MediaOne Group Inc. AOL's strategy ''hasn't changed. They've made the decision that it would be economically stupid to do it. ''In the near-term, it's not a big issue, but long-term it is the kind of thing that can change the company's growth dynamics. ''Cable companies will realize that providing customer support, doing marketing, costs a lot. To have AOL take care of that for you may be the right economic decision (for cable companies), especially when you gain access to AOL's 17 million subscribers. With its subscriber base, AOL holds a lot of cards.'' On Microsoft Corp. possibly investing in AT&T Corp.: ''The fear would be that Microsoft would sell its operating system on (cable-TV) set-top boxes, and make it so that AOL couldn't work on the set-top, or that people immediately join MSN, or use Hotmail. Microsoft has always had that capability on PC, but it hasn't helped them much. Again, there would problems with antitrust issues. ''People will use TVs for Internet access. There's a place for AOL in that.'' On the impact on At Home Corp.: ''It's a positive for At Home, because I think you'll see a merger between At Home and Road Runner.''