Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zardoz who wrote (33253)	5/6/1999 8:56:00 AM
From: Bobby Yellin	Respond to of 116762

great post.. but to get the gold market higher back then wouldn't have taken that much money.. hopefully you don't see this as a non sequitur.. also if the "too big to fail" gets disproven again.. some of those other vehicles might lose their luster? how much should greenspan raise the rates..(I think he got traumatized when he actually did something right before the 1987 crash :-) great point about reserves..and that analogy..to prove it.. Thank you so much for putting me back in my place bobby

To: Zardoz who wrote (33253)	5/6/1999 9:00:00 AM
From: donald martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116762

<<A person could suggest that the commodity is over hanging the market, yet until production is under way, it's just a reserve.>> True. But don't speculators takes reserves into consideration when making decisions to commit to a commodity? <<There aint enough gold to hedge with.>> Another reason I'm long term positive. :)