Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorrie coey who wrote (46128)	5/6/1999 10:27:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 67261

I mean, it is obvious! Come on, let's face it!LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

To: lorrie coey who wrote (46128)	5/6/1999 10:29:00 AM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I wouldn't give Stephanopolous that much credit.

To: lorrie coey who wrote (46128)	5/6/1999 10:36:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

oh oh, lorrie. Taboo subject there. It doesn't much matter that a lot of people who were there agree, at least to the point of saying that Reagan wasn't exactly much of a presense in the Reagan administration. They all liked the guy, anyway. I'd debate the GHWB part, though. Bush was always considered suspect by the true blue conservatives. The line at the time was Meese, Deever, and Baker were the powers behind the thrown. But Deever was mostly a PR type, not to mention the alcoholic fog, and Meese? My money's on Baker.