Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: diana g who wrote (44154)	5/6/1999 11:26:00 AM
From: SliderOnTheBlack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

diana g; great post & links; I agree ! / BELW - technicians take a look Diana g; thanks; hey - I've felt like a one man Clean Up crew around here lately; been having to wear my ''electronic'' bullet proof vest all too often (VBG) ! I have often been the target of what I would definitely call; less than ''Lydia Baldridge-like'' comments. It's about time ''someone'' decided to do something to clean up ''Dodge.'' Yes; even ''I'' have feelings. Thanks for rallying to my side Diana g. Look out Bad Guys ! - There is ''definitely'' a New Sherrif in Town ! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>VBG<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ******************************************************************************* BELW: Great technicals here. Low, low risk E&P. Good Nat Gas leverage/exposure. Bottom is firmly in place $3 11/16ths-$4 ish - well off its' recent highs. Company is financially positioned to acquire some properties here - and is getting some good analyst commentary of late. Technicians - opinions on this one ? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ PS Diana g; what do you like here, at what price and most importantly - why ? Please share your most valued insight & opinion with us; we are waiting with ''baited'' breath by the way...... your pal and greatest Netiquette fan, $lider uhhh ohhh; << There is peace right now, but you know it won't last. >> ... now that disturbs me. Can't we all just give Peace a chance ? "You know it won't last'' - ? Why so pessimestic ? ......Can you say ''statute of limitations'' ? Hooooooooooooooooo Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ! 'cause I can.

To: diana g who wrote (44154)	5/6/1999 12:13:00 PM
From: RealMuLan	Respond to of 95453

diana: agree to your suggestion. Reporting to Webmistress usually works. However, in cases if somebody personally attack some high profile public figures, even if nobody reports, he will be punished for sure. The last thing SI wants is this kind of high profile negative publicity. So everybody should be double careful in attacking public figures.

To: diana g who wrote (44154)	5/9/1999 9:52:00 AM
From: diana g	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

CIVILITY TO ONE ANOTHER HERE??? Only if those who are inclined to post messages which are in violation of the 'Terms of Use' restrain themselves. We can only reasonably expect this self-restraint if they believe there is a cost to them for such conduct. It will take a little convincing, imho. SI Administrators do not monitor threads as a general rule. They act when they are informed of violations. EVERYONE--DON'T EXPECT THAT SOMEONE ELSE WILL DO THIS. If I'm the only one who thinks this is necessary and appropriate, then I will accept the common sentiment and just un-bookmark this thread (as so many others have done) the next time we have the mud-slinging. When someone makes personal attacks, or otherwise violates the 'Terms of Use', simply report them to Jill the webmistress, whose email address is on most every page, or report it to SI Admin (Bob) by Private Message Here's his profile, just click on 'Private Message' and tell him about it. Member 4591117 you could 'peoplemark' Bob's profile so it would be real easy to find. If the attack is against you, don't respond in kind, just report it. If the attack is against another, report it. If it's two misguided angry people slinging mud, report them both. In your message to Bob or Jill, give them link(s) to the offensive post(s), and quotes from them, as appropriate. Or simply give the 'REPLY #', and the thread's name, and ask Bob or Jill to take a look at it, to see if it violates the 'Terms of Use.' TERMS OF USE Click on 'Terms of Use' at the bottom of most pages to see them. Here's a snip: "...B. You agree not to use the service for illegal purposes or for the transmission of material that is unlawful, harassing, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, abusive, threatening, harmful, vulgar, obscene, tortious, improper or otherwise objectionable... "