SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (57439)5/6/1999 1:55:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571808
 
Paul - <because IBM is considering an investment in AMD - close to 20%.>

Kind of Deja Vu. I'm sure you remember when IBM did a 20% (or was it 30%) investment in Intel in 1985 -1986. As I remember it, Intel got out from under that investment as soon as possible. I wonder if such a step would be just the first in AMD losing its independence?

PB



To: Paul Engel who wrote (57439)5/6/1999 1:59:00 PM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571808
 
Paul,

Re: AMD ? IBM ?

Have you bought back into AMD or are you still out.

If this rumor is true(unlikely IMHO) then the stock should double PDQ!!!

Regards,

Kash



To: Paul Engel who wrote (57439)5/6/1999 6:22:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571808
 
Paul - RE: "Actually, I am expecting AMD and IBM to make an announcement
soon.

One of the reasons why IBM did not want Cyrix is, as my sources
report, because IBM is considering an investment in AMD - close
to 20%.

This sounds like the rumors from a year ago, but that's "what I
hear"."

I like the sound of that!

BTW Paul, Intel's investment in MU isn't doing all too well now.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News