SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rande Is who wrote (6309)5/6/1999 2:24:00 PM
From: Spark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57584
 
This one traded near the $20. level not too long ago..

| BizWire ]

------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Picture: Click Here for Discover Brokerage>
Related QuotesENBC
3 19/32
+2 9/32
delayed 20 mins - disclaimer
Thursday May 6, 8:00 am Eastern Time

Company Press Release

SOURCE: Energy BioSystems Corporation

President Clinton Proposes New Sulfur Specifications for Gasoline - Energy BioSystems' Biodesulfurization Technology Ideally Positioned to Help Industry Meet New Standards

THE WOODLANDS, Texas, May 6 /PRNewswire/ -- Newly proposed sulfur specifications for gasoline that provide a significant opportunity to implement Energy BioSystems' (Nasdaq: ENBC - news) proprietary biodesulfurization technology have been announced by the Clinton Administration.

On Saturday, May 1, 1999, President Clinton personally announced newly proposed federal standards for sulfur levels in gasoline that promise to allow automobiles to run 80 percent cleaner. The tough new specifications call for 30 parts per million sulfur in gasoline, down from the current average of 340 parts per million. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that this reduction in gasoline sulfur would be equivalent to removing 166 million cars from the road, and would take 3 million tons of pollution out of the air. The plan would be phased in between 2004 and 2006, and about two dozen smaller refiners would be granted an additional two years to meet the standard.

Refiners argue that the cost may be too high to meet the new sulfur standards. The oil industry estimates that meeting the new sulfur targets using existing technology will require more than $6 billion in new U.S. refinery investment and add as much as 6 to 10 cents to a gallon of gasoline.

Energy BioSystems believes it has a feasible solution with potential benefits to both industry and the environment. The Company is currently developing its biocatalytic technology to desulfurize gasoline at a target cost of 1 to 2 cents per gallon of gasoline, with a requirement for capital investment that could be up to 50 percent less than would be required to implement existing technology. In addition to the cost advantages, biodesulfurization technology offers the advantage of operating under milder conditions, while consuming less energy and emitting fewer greenhouse gases than existing technologies.

The Company is currently working on a $3 million dollar program to complete the development of its gasoline biodesulfurization technology. This program is funded 80 percent by the U.S. Department of Energy, and oversight is provided by a committee of the Coordinating Research Council, with members representing both the auto and oil industries. ''The development of our proprietary technology clearly has been recognized as a win-win for both government and industry,'' stated Dr. Peter P. Policastro, Chief Operating Officer, ''as biodesulfurization has the potential to produce the desired low- sulfur fuels at substantially lower cost and with much less impact on the environment compared to traditional technologies.''

The EPA has also indicated that it will ''put forward shortly'' a proposal for cleaner diesel fuel. Similar sulfur standards for diesel fuel will be much more difficult to reach using conventional technology, while biodesulfurization offers the same advantages for diesel fuel as for gasoline. Energy BioSystems has already licensed its first unit for diesel fuel biodesulfurization to Petro Star Inc., a subsidiary of Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, for their Valdez, Alaska refinery.

Energy BioSystems Corporation, of Houston, is developing and commercializing biotechnology-based processes for the petroleum refining and production industries. The company's focus to date has been on developing biocatalytic desulfurization, a proprietary process involving the use of enzymes to remove sulfur from petroleum, including gasoline, diesel, and heavy and crude oils, while operating at mild temperature and pressure. The Company is also pursuing opportunities to apply the principles of biocatalysis to the chemical industry, initially by developing a line of organo-sulfur products that are derived from its biodesulfurization process. Additional information about Energy BioSystems is available at the company's web site: www.energybiosystems.com.

This document contains forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including but not limited to, the Company's need for additional funds, the ability to raise sufficient funds on acceptable terms, its history of operating issues, the technical uncertainty and risks associated with commercialization of the Company's technology, the Company's reliance on environmental regulations and the uncertainty of the adoption of any newly proposed regulations, the market acceptance of the Company's technology, the Company's dependence on collaboration partners, competition, and the ability to enforce and defend the Company's patents and proprietary technologies. Should one or more of such risks and uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. For a discussion of such risks and assumptions, see ''Risk Factors'' included in the Company's annual report or Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.

SOURCE: Energy BioSystems Corporation



To: Rande Is who wrote (6309)5/6/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: D. K. G.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
 
Rande be sure to look into ANTC as they are a large equipment supplier to TCI and I'm sure will also be the primary source of HFC for UMG.

Message 9266200

Some numbers from the AT+T/UMG combination, ex TCI (I think)

zdnet.com

ARRIS is an ANTC joint partnership with NN. Their cornerstone product is used in cable telephony and tops in the field.

arris-i.com
techstocks.com

ANTC has had accelerating revenue growth and EPS, especially when compared Y-o-Y.

Cheers, enjoy your thread.

Denis



To: Rande Is who wrote (6309)5/27/1999 8:26:00 AM
From: D. K. G.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
 
AT&T revises cable telephony tests
By John Borland
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
May 26, 1999, 12:15 p.m. PT

news.com

AT&T is revising the early rollout plans for its ambitious cable telephone system, adding a new set of tests aimed at reducing network traffic jams once the technology becomes widely used.

The company is in the first stages of testing technology for cable telephony, with the hope that the trials will help it directly compete with local phone companies like Bell Atlantic and US West. Ultimately, AT&T wants to offer consumers a one-stop shop for local and long distance voice service, high-speed Internet, and cable TV.

The public phase of its cable phone tests began earlier this month in Fremont, California--the first of ten cities scheduled to try out the service this year.

But the company is now throwing a new element into its tests, using a radically different network configuration in a Salt Lake City trial that could help the company maintain call quality as more customers sign up for the service.

AT&T says that the Fremont tests have been going well, and that the addition of Salt Lake City is an unrelated test of new technology. Test for other cities are proceeding along an original plan, unaffected by plans for Salt Lake City, a spokesman said.

"The technology we're using in Fremont and the other cities works very well. We're very pleased," said Mark Siegal, an AT&T spokesman. "We are not redesigning our cable telephony network, nor are we changing the costs associated with it."

But the new trial, which would vastly scale back the number of users sharing each piece of the cable system, could help the company preserve the quality of its telephone service, analysts said.

Testing the system's limits

The technology that AT&T is using in Fremont and other cities has been well tested in the field already, analysts say.

Cox Communications, the current U.S. leader in cable telephony, already has more than 42,000 users on its system and uses similar architecture to AT&T's, said Michael Harris, president of cable research firm Kinetic Strategies .

Under those systems, an average of between 500 and 1,000 homes would share a single cable network. AT&T says each individual strand of its network will pass about 600 homes.

This isn't a problem, however, until close to 25 percent or 30 percent of these homes passed sign up for the same services, and use the system at the same time, analysts say. Once this happens, the quality of calls could degrade, potentially creating a echo-like interference similar to that experienced on some cellular calls.

The problem can be compared to what happens with broadband cable Internet services such as @Home. Users share the amount of bandwidth available on a neighborhood cable network--so a larger number of customers online decreases the bandwidth available to any single user.

The call-quality issue is not universal, however, and can have more to do with the quality of a given cable network than the number of users on a system. "We have nodes well in excess of 30-percent penetration, and we're not experiencing that," said Chuck McElroy, Cox's vice president of new services support.

AT&T's cable infrastructure is generally viewed as less advanced than companies like Cox or MediaOne, which have already moved heavily into cable telephony, analysts say.

Cable companies can fix their bandwidth problem fairly simply. By adding equipment that splits a cable "node" serving 600 or so customers, an operator can divide a system so that there is the equivalent of 300 users on two seemingly separate systems, for example.

AT&T is essentially testing an advanced version of this technology in Salt Lake City, adding fiber-optic lines deeper into the cable system and creating networks shared by just 50 to 75 people.

This kind of configuration would be more expensive to roll out than AT&T's planned telephony network. But even if it is successful, the company wouldn't need to implement this kind of system for years, analysts said. If bandwidth begins to be a problem, the company could use more incremental "node-splitting" upgrades, or simply dedicate more of their cable channels to telephony, Harris said.

Nevertheless, the Salt Lake City trial could be a kind of second-generation test, aimed at gathering data for use if the system does become popular faster than expected, said Yankee Group senior analyst Brian Adamik.

"This is a brand-new network they're rolling out, and there will be bumps along the road," Adamik said. "That's why you have trials. There are new market findings every day."
------

Hi Rande, just following up on my ANTC suggestion.
Message 9380648
IMHO, fits in well with your GIC.
techstocks.com

Have a good day,

dkg



To: Rande Is who wrote (6309)9/13/1999 8:24:00 AM
From: Rande Is  Respond to of 57584
 
Broadband giants, CNXT & HLIT to split 2-for-1. Check this out. . .

finance.yahoo.com
finance.yahoo.com

Ever see a prettier chart than these? Can you say broadband? Looks like the internets of January. . . which STILL are nowhere near their highs. If anyone is still heavy in internets and light in broadband, they may be dissatisfied from missing out on the fabulous gains this sector has been seeing.

More on GIC. . .remember we originally bought GIC in the 30's. . so we've made plenty already from it. . .Wondering how T feels about this news. . . they bought 20 percent of GIC. . .and have some really big and important orders with them. Perhaps we will get some answers to that question on today's Faber report. My guess is that there is no truth to the rumor.

Rande Is