SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Ounce who wrote (5664)5/18/1999 5:36:00 PM
From: Bill Ounce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
comp.risks Massachusetts nuke plant work-around

RISKS-LIST: Risks-Forum Digest Tuesday 18 May 1999 Volume 20 : Issue 40

FORUM ON RISKS TO THE PUBLIC IN COMPUTERS AND RELATED SYSTEMS (comp.risks)
ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy, Peter G. Neumann, moderator

[...]

This issue is archived at <URL:http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/20.40.html>
and at ftp.sri.com/risks/ .

[...]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 16:05:42 +0100
From: "Perry, Mike" <mperry@europe.dg.com>
Subject: Nuclear plant Y2K: High risk-readiness or high-risk readiness?

I read this last week on Silicon.com's news site (http://www.silicon.com):

A US nuclear plant has received a warning from the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NCR) after fears were raised over the Y2K readiness of an
emergency backup generator. Massachusetts Congressman, Edward Markey,
said the NRC has written to the Pilgrim nuclear plant expressing concern
that the generator will not be able to keep the facility safe in the event
of a Y2K blackout. The plant's owner said the problem will be solved by
adjusting the temperature limit for the generator.

Well, that's alright then, I don't suppose that the temperature limiter
serves any valid safety purpose, nor that running it outside the limits
prescribed by the manufacturers carries any RISKs....