Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Genesis Media Group, Inc (GNNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ted M who wrote (2928)	5/7/1999 1:03:00 AM
From: pete2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3129

thanks Ted for your willingness to monitor this thread.... the primary difference between yourself and myself is that i have never owned a share of this stock. and as i have posted before, it is just by sheer luck.... i had a limit order in at bid or below a couple of time and got lucky and a sale did not take place. i am older and was attracted to this company by the hype i read during the pump and dump when this stock was much much higher... i was honestly excited about a James Dean movie, Jimmy Hendrix and really thought the company was sitting on a gold mine when Frank Sinatra died. was i ever dumb... however, by the time "Hopey the Hound Dog" drink came along i could not longer maintain my self-composure... i just laugh my tail off when i see stuff like this posted.... i personally do not believe this company would still be in existence (using the word business is disgusting) if the SEC was not frying bigger fish. anyone with a half a brain can see right thru the company. however, i too had stars in my eyes at one time over this company and i count my blessings that my order was never filled. this is a company that one loses all their clothes in, not just their shirt. if you see some guys walking down the street in just their underwear, please do not be rude and ask them if they are gnnx investors..... i really think that some of the current stock holders who pursue the truth and post are doing a real service to all bb investors... gives us an insight from what it is like to be a victim of a pump and dump operation.... hey guys, i am just kidding, new management is gonna get a nasdaq listing on this stock.... hahahahhaahhaaha, darn it, sorry but that old Hopey the Hound Dog drink pete2 just came out for a minute... hahahaha thanks again Ted for posting. you might save some fresh meat from themselves... the new pete2

To: Ted M who wrote (2928)	5/7/1999 2:12:00 AM
From: out_of_the_loop	Respond to of 3129

Ted: That was one fine post and I echo your thoughts and reasons for monitoring this thread. One has to laugh at the logic of "this article said ____, so why are you here posting?..." Is that article a Bible that is to be taken word for word literally as is done by some ad absurdium , or to be interpreted generally in context to a specific situation? I find it hilarious that someone might suggest indirectly that I might be a short in GNNX because I monitor the thread. While it might be true that people generally move on, I think a lot of decent people monitor these threads because they want to see who the pumpers are if they continue to invest in BBs, because they want to see if the "company" can continue to publish crap that never comes to fruition and because they want to help newbies from making the same mistakes they did (as per your post). I follow this thread for those reasons and also because I want to see if the day comes when the SEC holds them responsible. I monitor a few others, as well as "Thread Morons", as a reality check. I think it is sad that people would actually expect previously burned investors to move on and watch idly, not saying a word while others were scammed in a Kitty Genovese stock analogy, and it is sick to think more, rather than less, of people because they did not want to get involved. I also think that SI has many decent people who cooperate and share DD; it does not have to be positive dd. Yes, there are hypesters, both long and short - and you pay your money and you take your chances. Truth usually exists somewhere between the well-reasoned positive and negative arguments. This company has never, in my opinion, produced any substantive releases that have been verifiable or produced income on the bottom line. Many companies turn around after failure and they are a real find. This company has not really shown how it is different than it was a year ago, either in M.O. or convincingly in personnel. It looks like the same old wolf in bad internet clothing. *"Grandma GNNX, is that you? My, what big plans* you have..."**