SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (80539)5/7/1999 1:06:00 AM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
I thought Dr. Barrett said we can't grow 35% a year.



To: Diamond Jim who wrote (80539)5/7/1999 2:20:00 AM
From: denni  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
>>Okay that's reasonable and the stock was at 102 in July of '97. I wouldn't call 102 to 119 in 21 months a crazy run up.

you forgot about splits. see chart:

investor.msn.com



To: Diamond Jim who wrote (80539)5/7/1999 2:55:00 PM
From: f.simons  Respond to of 186894
 
>the stock was at 102 in July of '97. I wouldn't call 102 to 119 in 21 months a crazy run up.<

We can always pick certain dates and distort the "run ups". The rise to 102 in 1997 came right on the heels of the last split. It then fell to app 65. The run from 65 to 143 WAS very fast.
Having said that, I agree with you that Intel has not been a barn burner the last 21 months.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News