SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GVTucker who wrote (80571)5/7/1999 1:07:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
GV - re: "If somebody here is pulling "cock-n-bull shit" numbers out their derriere, it is you.
"

No, TUCKER - it is YOU.

You used the "cock-n-bull shit" numbers on Intel - I SHOWED YOU WHAT A PILE OF CRAP YOUR ANALYSIS WAS AND IS - and probably ALWAYS WILL BE.

Your phony-analysis of COMPAQ is just another illustration of your way of promulgating misleading concepts while employing "cock-n-bull shit" data.

Paul



To: GVTucker who wrote (80571)5/7/1999 1:11:00 PM
From: Dave Budde  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
GV, give us all a break. Find me a better company that has delivered substantial and consistent stock price growth over a 30 year period. Answer, there simply isn't one. The only strategy for investing in Intel is to buy when you can, averaging in and then hold.



To: GVTucker who wrote (80571)5/7/1999 1:56:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
<If somebody here is pulling "cock-n-bull shit" numbers out their derriere, it is you.>

GV, give it a rest. You aren't demonstrating anything with your ability to pick and choose your comparisons in order to make your point.

Tenchusatsu