SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RWS who wrote (29257)5/7/1999 1:59:00 PM
From: jsavage  Respond to of 79241
 
RWS
Thanks for the laugh!
JAS



To: RWS who wrote (29257)5/7/1999 2:05:00 PM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 79241
 
RWS,

Geez, and I thought I was being nebulous with a call for a correction to begin showing up starting around here a few weeks ago. No way is it going up...much. Did I mention I expect 12% off the high when it's over?

BTW...for all MIMBO fans out there who are still brave enough to go long on anything, BNYN is at a cycle low that MIMBOs put in as they begin their next uptrend acceleration. If BNYN accelerates, it's going to start here.

Doug R



To: RWS who wrote (29257)5/7/1999 9:42:00 PM
From: HairBall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 79241
 
RWS: I ignored your first post to me a couple of weeks ago, as you are just a cockroach, not really worthy of a reply. I see humor goes right over your head or maybe just through it. Now once again you attack the MDA thread, not just me.

I can reference my posted expectations for the correction to begin in Mid April, weeks in advance. I described a Market rise into Mid April and then describe the rotation that was going to and has occurred in post in Feb and March.

Now, I presume those that attacked me from this thread a few weeks ago will start taking bows for calling this correction/rotation. Even though they were attacking my expectations, just a few weeks ago.

What a joke...

No Regards,
LG



To: RWS who wrote (29257)5/8/1999 8:00:00 PM
From: JG  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 79241
 
I'm much the lurker, but had to respond to this comment. Poster does not seem to be too bright. Clearly said in jest. Jg