To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (1802 ) 5/10/1999 6:44:00 PM From: Jesse Read Replies (1) | Respond to
Hi Kids. Just got in-- stock weak again today, as impatienters sell out, I guess... It's a waiting period (sure not as fun!), as has been iterated here. One such example, this one from the prez [04/28]:Message 9305374 : We anticipate, but certainly do not guarantee, based on general geological principles and an in-depth working knowledge of the area, an N-S axis in excess of 90km. We have taken samples and have exhumed archived samples and they are being processed. We'll see.Our geochemical grades are very high, except for gold, compared to the other Alberta metal plays. Of course, we only have 11 samples so far. It will be interesting to see how the two plays develop, either independently or geologically related to each other. If there are any budding mining analysts out there it would be interesting to see comparisons of the players on a market cap basis, a potential tonnes basis and on a metal grade basis as the play(s) develop. Marum might compare favourably.there is mineralization extending well over 70 metres in thickness, with some very high numbers coming from samples which did not look very interesting in terms of sulphide mineralization. Early indications suggest that a "thickness of interest" of at least 70 metres has been defined. My guess is that it is somewhat thicker, based on visual observations. "Message 9209649
