To: The Swordsman who wrote (27735 ) 5/8/1999 2:32:00 AM From: tfk Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 44908
My thoughts on the Swordsman.4. If better decisions had been made to date we wouldn't have gone from 28,000,000 to more than 100,000,000 shares outstanding in a year. Grandiose ideas and piss poor execution. Another one of Swordsman lies. There are 100,000,000 shares authorized not "outstanding". There is an important distinction between these two words. Swords can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all the people all the time. People, I hope you're not listening to this stock manipulator. He is very good at what he does, this I must give him credit. But don't be duped into selling your shares to him. Swordsman, who do you work for? Are you or your employer shorting the stock? I don't expect you to answer, since you know I won't believe anything coming from a liar anyway. People don't be conned by this lowlife who is really the consummate scam artist, not Gordon. His agenda is clear--casting doubts and negativity about the company to lower the share price. Yes, he does throw in some positive comments here and there, but this is just a smoke-screen tactic to win your trust. Don't fall into his trap. As far as this thing about getting lawyers to look over the SEC documents, I wouldn't give my money to him or anybody who remains anonymous. How can you trust an anonymous liar? In fact, this is likely to be just another one of his scheme to sidetrack you and to make you believe he has the best interest of investors in mind...NOT. Do you trust Gordon, Hwang, Guild, and rest of management or do you trust Swordsman, DitchDigger, and rest of his ilk? Are you going to put money into some anonymous, lying lowlife or into respectable leaders of a turnaround Internet company experiencing rapid growth. It's very easy and obvious to me whom to put my money in. tfk