SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FedWatcher who wrote (29502)5/8/1999 1:13:00 PM
From: w molloy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Ericy

Do you have access to the QCOM option terms?
I'll re-itterate a previous post.
My option terms (for another SD company) specifically vest my
options if I'm laid off, and if the company or division is sold.
Indeed, my division was sold off a year or so ago, and my options were fully vested. (Unfortunately the exercise price sucked - buts thats the risk you take)

I lose my options if I'm fired for 'cause'. 'cause' is basically actiing in a way detrimental to the company - stealing computers for example.

I would be very surprised if the QCOM terms were dissimilar



To: FedWatcher who wrote (29502)5/8/1999 1:31:00 PM
From: w molloy  Respond to of 152472
 
Fortune Magazine : Stock-Option Magic at Microsoft
July 7, 1997
pathfinder.com

When Microsoft went public in 1986, it wasn't because the business
needed money--the 11-year-old software company was already a
cash machine. No, Microsoft had to go public so employees could
cash in all the stock and stock options they'd been accumulating.

Cash in they have. Options have been at the heart of Microsoft's
compensation system, and its finances, ever since. In the first three months of
this year, employees realized an estimated $730 million in profits from their
stock options. That's $32,000 per employee. What about unexercised options
gains? Another $23 billion was outstanding as of March 31, or $1 million per
employee. Neither total reflects the multibillion-dollar holdings of CEO Bill
Gates or executive vice president Steve Ballmer, since neither takes options.

The options bonanza costs nothing on Microsoft's income statement, as
reckoned by current accounting standards. Which is why conventional
profit-and-loss calculations don't come close to reflecting the economic reality
of a company like Microsoft.

Start by looking at the company's reported earnings for the first quarter of
1997: $1.042 billion. Obviously, if Microsoft suddenly had to pay employees in
cash the $730 million they made exercising options, the earnings would be
70% lower--and the stock would be in a shambles. There's a more subtle effect
as well. The IRS allows businesses to treat employees' options gains as if they
are paid in cash; in this case, employees' first-quarter gains led to a $256
million tax savings that increased Microsoft's reported earnings by 25%.

The millions of shares employees acquired with their options had to come
from somewhere. To avoid diluting existing shareholders by issuing new
shares, Microsoft continually buys back stock from investors. Buybacks cost
$1.951 billion in the first quarter. Such spending drains Microsoft's cash
hoard--but doesn't appear as an expense on the income statement.

What about the unexercised options? They don't show up as a liability on the
balance sheet, although they surely are if the company plans to keep doing
buybacks. With $23 billion in options outstanding, that's something
Microsoft executives have been playing up in meetings with analysts and
investors in an effort to persuade them that the $9 billion the company is
holding in cash and short-term investments is not excessive.

Put all these pieces together, and it's clear that reported earnings alone don't
tell the whole story. But don't expect things to change anytime soon. The
standard-setters for the accounting profession tried for years to find a better
way to account for employee stock options. They've essentially given up.