SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (37117)5/8/1999 3:05:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 108807
 
Right, Cincinnatus.

>>>>>Congressional Record excerpt,11/7/1997
Topic: Fast Track legislation by Robert C. Byrd D-WV
The story of Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus
Oh, that we could review again the story of Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus, who in the year 458 B.C. was called upon by a delegation from the Roman senate. And upon inquiring why this delegation had come to him to interrupt his plowing of his small farm of three acres alongside the Tiber River, he was informed that the senate had decided to thrust upon him the power of a dictator so that he could rid Rome of the threat of certain tribes to the east, the Aequians. And being the loyal patriot that he was, Cincinnatus turned to his wife Racilia and said, 'We may not have enough food to live on this winter because we won't be able to sow our fields.' Nevertheless, he wiped his perspiring forehead, took on the regalia of a dictator, and loyally assumed the responsibilities and duties that the Roman senate had placed upon him. He rid the city of Rome of the threats, and he relieved the Roman legions that were being surrounded by the armies of the tribes to the east. Within 16 days, he had accomplished this mission. And he turned back the powers of dictatorship.

So there was the old-fashioned model of simplicity, the old-fashioned model of one who did not seek power, who did not want power. He did not want the power thrust upon him, but he willingly gave up this power.

So, today, the people of the United States, I am sure, feel that power is what politicians most crave. Isn't it the thirst for power that causes politicians to chase campaign money like a hound on the scent of a fox? Isn't it power that opens doors, rolls out red carpets, and serves up free food and drink? Isn't it really power, more often than character, that invites the respect of others? So how can the public possibly accept the notion that Congress is actually giving up some of its power--its constitutional power--through fast track?<<<<<