To: Bruce Hoyt who wrote (14257 ) 5/9/1999 8:24:00 AM From: Dennis P Respond to of 19109
Compression ratios? Encryption? MP3? Check out this article from CNET News from Friday morning. You should read the whole article (link below), but here's an excerpt that will make TMMI longs all warm and fuzzy inside: Whither MP3? For the moment, analysts agree that consumers have chosen MP3 as a standard, but the technology lacks all the components necessary to give it staying power: true CD-quality sound, fast download speeds for all, and the hit content consumers want. "At roughly 11:1, today's compression schemes have impressively delivered near-CD-quality sound. The problem is that even at the aforementioned ratio, onerous downloads are the reality for mainstream consumers accessing the Internet over dial-up connections," Mooradian wrote in his report. "For households with only one phone line, this is especially unrealistic. "A new file format that doubles or triples the compression and subsequently cuts the download time while maintaining the sound fidelity may well obviate the demand for MP3 simply because it is far more practical," he added. And according to the a2b Music spokeswoman, "It's nice that [music news, download, and community site] MP3.com has 10,000 bands no one has heard of, but what matters is that music people want is available for download." One possible solution could be an encrypted MP3 format such as those offered by Audio Explosion, MCY, or AudioSoft. Those companies have the advantage of offering both the familiar and popular MP3 format with built-in security. But often the players support both encrypted and unencrypted files, so record labels refuse to offer their content to them. Many companies in the music download space say they are "format agnostic"--they offer music via MP3 now but will switch when consumers adopt another format. news.com