To: PaulM who wrote (33522 ) 5/9/1999 6:42:00 AM From: Elsewhere Respond to of 116762
City Comment: Gold for sale Electronic Telegraph ISSUE 1443, Saturday 8 May 1999 THE new Labour government thought that gold was a barbarous relic. An up-to-date, trend-setting country could manage without it. So the Bank of England was told to start selling the gold in its vaults at $35 an ounce, the price at which the Banque de France was buying it. Which of them was right became clear when the price went to $350 and then to $850. That was Harold Wilson's first government and now today's New Labour government is at it again. It has ordered a clearance sale in Threadneedle Street and will not be content until more than half of the gold that is still there has gone. By signalling its punches to the market, it makes sure of getting the worst price. This is what Gordon Brown would call transparency. At the end of a century of inflation, finance ministers of his stamp still shun gold and would rather have each others' promises to pay. Gold's value does not depend on anybody's promise and that makes an anomaly in their eyes and a challenge to their own authority. They have already stamped out competition among the currencies of Europe. The Chancellor wants us to come into this monopoly and use its Monopoly money, as the up-to-date, trend-following thing to do. His clearance sale will clear the way for it. As for the Prime Minister, he may well believe that gold is "history", his term for everything that happened before New Labour was invented. Gold has a long history and ministers' promises a rather shorter one, but long enough to teach us which of the two to trust.telegraph.co.uk :80/et?ac=000626415357098&rtmo=VZVxxkFx&atmo=99999999&pg=/et/99/5/8/cncom08.html