SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PiMac who wrote (12272)5/9/1999 8:44:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
There is no legal right to choose which laws suit one...
There was nothing wrong with the discovery process according to the statutes that Clinton himself had signed into law...
Since Clinton was not materially better off having lied, and yet survived in office, the exception does not seem warranted...
Judge Wright warned the President that there would be a lengthy airing of the issues if there were an appeal. That is true, and seems fair enough...

PiMac, the thing you seem to have trouble grasping is that they had a right to ask Clinton those questions, that he himself (in effect) gave them that right by supporting the relevant statutes, and that therefore he had no right to have defrauded the court...



To: PiMac who wrote (12272)5/9/1999 9:56:00 AM
From: Les H  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 13994
 
He could've filed motions or appeals, which they likely did, if they objected to certain procedures, including discovery. This is a bogus argument.