Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (56135)	5/9/1999 6:36:00 PM
From: astyanax	Respond to of 164684

Yeah, Michael Murphy is frequently quoted in the press yet his recent track record is abysmal. I just came across an article going into this in great detail. I'll put it up on my Internet Stock Naysayers page. So right now you can see the Michael Murphy section at netconductor.com and a few other pundits who have owned up to a poor history of prognosticating: netconductor.com >>Michelle Harris wrote: Amazingly, Michael Murphy is even more wrong than Abelson. And yet, you still see Murphy quoted on the business news, and in many cases they give him more credit than he deserves saying he is bullish on some rallying stock, when in fact he rode it down 50% or soemthing and is actually in the red. The opposite situation happens with Fleckelstein (who posts here), he gets less credit than he deserves I think, maybe because hes too flamboyant.