SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: H James Morris who wrote (56158)5/9/1999 8:11:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
I'll take that bet, but Amzn will end up merging with a Kleiner child, and It will
eventually have to be one with deeper pockets.


Here is where se differ. I do not believe Kleiner Perkins has any desire to have a connection to AMZN. AMZN has served its purpose for them and Bezos comes with AMZN and he is out of their "family." Presently, AOL sells three times the revenue of AMZN in ecommerce. AOL does not need to pay for distribution channels because their merchants take care of that for them.

This is the point, until Bezos improves his balance sheet, I don't think he can go back to
MS for more (I was blown away when they got him that last $1.2). I think you were too.
So how long can his $1.2 last?? Please forget his acquisitions. He's doing that with
printed stock certificates, not $cash.


I was also blown away that MS could get AMZN $1.2 billion more but it is not junk bond money. It really was a secondary and the stock had been in high demand. The equipment used for the new distribution centers is expensive as is all the remodeling. I doubt the suppliers of the equipment are taking stock. I expect the cash to be gone about one year from now. I know the acquisitions are done with stock so am ignoring them.

I have some bankrupt stock certificates in my archives. Here's just one, about 10 years
ago I had 5k shares in a bank called First Republic. When I bought the stock @ 25 it was
the 18th largest bank in the USA. FB went bankrupt because of all its losses. The fed
closed them down and sold all of its assets(for peanuts) to then NCNB, now its called
Nations bank. All us FB shareholders where left in a shell and we ended up with 12c on
the dollar.
Glenn that was for me a $125k loss. Trust me.


I do not want to get into a who has lost more contest. I never had a public company go bankrupt on me. I would like to be back on the side of who has made a lot of money in the market. I am taking "baby steps" now due to liquidity problems if something goes awry on these high flyers.

Glenn



To: H James Morris who wrote (56158)5/9/1999 9:58:00 PM
From: Miche Elle  Respond to of 164684
 
James, I'd venture that AOL is far more focused on a broadbanding acquisition than on anything else, much less AMZN.



To: H James Morris who wrote (56158)5/9/1999 10:07:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Amazon is not going to be merged into anyone at the rate they're going.

Market leaders who are building outward, gaining market share at the expense of their largest competitors, acquiring fast-growing startups for stock, are majority-owned by their founders, and who are having money thrown at them by the capital markets are in no danger.