Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TARADO96 who wrote (16129)	5/9/1999 6:01:00 PM
From: Vendit™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41369

I'm seriously considering unloading all my T shares at the open tomorrow. Sunday May 9 12:56 AM ET FCC's Cable Ownership Rules In Legal Limbo WASHINGTON (Reuters) - AT&T Corp. (NYSE:T - news)'s pending acquisition of MediaOne Group Inc. has renewed focus on a six-year legal battle over cable television ownership limits Congress passed in 1992 that have never gone into force. Under the 1992 Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, the Federal Communications Commission was to adopt rules setting a ''reasonable limit'' on the number of cable subscribers one company could reach either directly or through ''attributable'' interests in other companies. The law was intended to prevent any single cable operator from becoming so large that it could bully producers of cable programming and gain excessive influence over the programming market. In 1993, the FCC adopted rules which forbid any cable company from reaching more than 30 percent of all homes passed nationwide by cable. However, the 30-percent limit has never been in force due to legal actions. The rules were based on the percentage of homes capable of subscribing to cable instead of those that already subscribed so that an operator at the 30 cap could still add subscribers in its existing markets. To calculate a company's interests, the agency said any system in which a company had at least a 5 percent voting stake would be attributed to that company, unless another shareholder held at least 50 percent of the voting stock. Cable partnerships, where systems were operated by a partnership owned by more than one company, would also be attributed to each partner. So, under the FCC's rules, a calculation of whether AT&T was above the 30 percent limit would have to include a host of cable systems where AT&T has only a small ownership stake. AT&T officials, who want the rules changed, say after the MediaOne deal and related transactions, they would pass 35 to 39 percent of all homes passed by cable in the country. Others have said the number could be substantially higher, perhaps more than 60 percent. AT&T officials also say that while they expect the rules will be thrown out or greatly modified, they could restructure their various ownership stakes to meet the existing rules. After the 30-percent limit was passed, cable operators sued in federal court, challenging the legality of the underlying law and the FCC rules. A U.S. District Court in 1993 threw out the law as unconstitutional and the decision was appealed. After years of legal wrangling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is expected to hear oral arguments in December, with a decision likely a few months after that. Then the case is likely to be appealed to the Supreme Court, which could take a year or more to finally resolve the issue. Also the FCC is reconsidering the 30 percent level, which could be raised or lowered, and the attribution rules. Proposed revisions are expected in a few months.