To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (22403 ) 5/9/1999 8:23:00 PM From: RTev Respond to of 74651
Great post, as usual SFD. But some observations:The value of an ISP. First, that's an expensive business. One must maintain or lease all kinds of hardware for the service: modem banks for callers, mail servers, user-space web servers. One must also lease and often pay a metered per-bit rate for the network connections between all those points of presence and the internet. As mentioned in an earlier post, the changing models of the telephone utilities may soon force the price of ISP service to near zero anyway. Does Microsoft want to get so heavily into a business that may return so little in the long run?Win2000 and MSN. MSN Intenet Access is now a consumer service. Win2000 is a business system. I doubt that Microsoft is going to want to make Win2000 too appealing to consumers. Consider, for instance, the service calls that would go something like this: "I'm trying to change the time on my taskbar clock, but it keeps telling me 'You do not have the proper privilege level to change the System Clock'. What the hell does that mean?" or "I just saved a document, but now it disappeared. ... What do you mean? ... I don't remember what user name I was logged in on when I saved it. What difference does that make?" Those are the kinds of NT/Win2000 questions that corporate IT help desks handle all the time, but they aren't issues that Microsoft's help line would want to be inundated with.On the general issue of using MSN (in some form) to help sell software. That seems to have been exactly what Microsoft planned to do when MSN was originally envisioned as a network provider similar to AOL. It was proprietary. It was expected to offer many features that would work best or work only with Microsoft software. They've moved away from that, but still use some of those notions, but do it -- not through an ISP, but through the web. Encarta, Streets, and other CD-based products have updates and other features available only to those who own the product. Office2000 has extensive ties to Microsoft web sites. I'm not sure if there are exclusive web areas for owners, but it's possible.buying into direct ownership of cable. I fear they're a bit too late for that. Comcast is a closely-held family-controlled company. The Robinson family shows no signs of wanting to sell it. Cox is in a similar situation, although there are signs the family might be willing to sell that one. TWX is public, widely held, and deeply in debt, so they might consider dumping their cable holdings for a hefty price, but I suspect it would be very hefty. Any of these options would give the buyer only super-regional presence at most. But even if they did find someone to buy, do you really think Microsoft could run it? That's so far from what they do, I suspect they'd have massive problems in trying to manage such a utility.And on a free ISP affecting Linux The market for that system right now is in the server space. There's no sign that it's anywhere close to competing for the consumer desktop. Giving away an ISP connection isn't going to matter much to a company planning to hang their Linux Apache web server onto a T1 line. (By the way -- your point #2 would work with Windows2000, but would land them in court again if they tried it with Windows 98.)