Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Club Fatt! OTC BB -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matt Brown who wrote (73)	5/9/1999 11:09:00 PM
From: dexx	Respond to of 88

Matt, I have read this piece before, but it's always good to be reminded of the evil that lurks in the stock market. Thanks. Dexx

To: Matt Brown who wrote (73)	5/9/1999 11:10:00 PM
From: tinsoldier	Respond to of 88

Fatt Matt: Duly read and bookmarked with gratitude. eom

To: Matt Brown who wrote (73)	5/9/1999 11:35:00 PM
From: GERBER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 88

GDER News about deal between GDER and US Government is expected this week. Also check LUMM and EBID www.delsecur.com Do your own DD Gerber

To: Matt Brown who wrote (73)	5/16/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: Lynn Goodman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 88

Matt, just read the Chelekis essay What a superb lesson for CFU members. One question: after the MMs fleece the investors and the stock is back down to or below its floor, do they start the same process all over with that stock or always move onto a new one?

To: Matt Brown who wrote (73)	12/13/2006 10:32:34 AM
From: bones142O	Respond to of 88

I remember that great article well. It used to get posted all over rb back in 1999/2000 and tho I probably haven't seen it in 5 years, I still today quote one of those last sentences regularly as SPONSOR-DD has become one of my top-3 criteria. In these small cap stock markets, you are investing more in the INDIVIDUAL behind the play, than the "possibility" of the play itself. Ask yourself before speculating: Could I lend this person $5,000 for a year and hope to get it back? If not, then don't! Matt, do you still consider George Shelekis' article a "MUST READ"? Or to reframe my question, WHY ISN'T THIS GREAT ARTICLE POSTED AT THE IHUB HOMEPAGE?

To: Matt Brown who wrote (73)	12/16/2006 10:32:51 AM
From: bones142O	Respond to of 88

Also Matt, have you redd Sarbanes/Oxley and more specifically "Section 308" therein? I think it would be DYNO dood if you would post-link Sec.308 right smack in the CENTER of the ihub homepage....what a SUPER-EASY way to better inform your newby readers, especially those ihub-readers that got severely portfolio-snatched in ihub lit-up-board-fav's, CSHD and SLJB? Sec. 308. Fair Funds for Investors (a) CIVIL PENALTIES ADDED TO DISGORGEMENT FUNDS FOR THE RELIEF OF VICTIMS- If in any judicial or administrative action brought by the Commission under the securities laws (as such term is defined in section 3(a)(47) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(47)) the Commission obtains an order requiring disgorgement against any person for a violation of such laws or the rules or regulations thereunder, or such person agrees in settlement of any such action to such disgorgement, and the Commission also obtains pursuant to such laws a civil penalty against such person, the amount of such civil penalty shall, on the motion or at the direction of the Commission, be added to and become part of the disgorgement fund for the benefit of the victims of such violation. armaboston.org