Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PiMac who wrote (12281)	5/10/1999 4:32:00 AM
From: Bob Lao-Tse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

"I am less interested in whether Clinton was right to object..." Again, he didn't object. He lied.

To: PiMac who wrote (12281)	5/10/1999 4:34:00 AM
From: Bob Lao-Tse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

"I am less interested in whether Clinton was right to object..." Again, he didn't object. He lied.

To: PiMac who wrote (12281)	5/10/1999 9:01:00 AM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

I don't have the arguments or facts by which Clinton may have objected to the process. So, I can't determine whether his objections had any merits or how the judge considered these objections. It's ridiculous to allow for circumventing of the law when one sees fit just because your legal appeals have been found wanting. Why not recipricate and just get rid of individual rights if the individual does not have to respect the court of law as Clinton seems to do so often? How about giving each individual in the US the power to execute Executive Order so that each can decide whether to pay taxes, or be subject to any number of laws? Your argument is still bogus.