SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marginmike who wrote (29693)5/10/1999 5:14:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Three Separate Posts From Yahoo>

Huge press release imminent
by: Wing_Attack_Plan_R (38/M/San Diego, CA)
19780 of 19784
Will be a classic 'good for shareholders;bad for employees' scenario. Yes: I know what it is. NO, I will not
disclose it due to my loyalty to QC.

This news wasn't expected until after the ericy deal was fully closed on the 24th, but with SEC approval of
that announced today, there's no need to delay the announcement further. Besides: a delay will further the
chance that someone spills the beans on a message board before an official announcement. That would be
unfortunate.

QC will SOAR in the days, weeks and years ahead.

QCOM TO GO UP BIG TIME
by: bigalraiderfan
19782 of 19784
major news release very soon. look out, this stock to double and split again very soon.get on now before i
told you so.

General Jack Ripper, huh? OK.. if you say so!

Yes: I got the word on this news announcement too <sigh>. Life at Qualcomm will never be the same again
for employees. Ironically, many QC employees that transferred to Ericy will soon see that THEY actually
will come out better than many left behind!

As a result, I'm amending my earlier forecast as follows: this stock will not take a beating from the employee
lawsuit. I overstated my case (not that I thought the suit had merit to begin with.)

I'm pleased that General Ripper did not disclose the details, and out of respect for QC: neither will I. From a
business standpoint, this news will be stupendous, logical, and will serve to reward shareholders even better
than the ericy thing did.

Go QC. Go longs!



To: marginmike who wrote (29693)5/10/1999 5:53:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 152472
 
You sure seem to have gone through a lot of handsets ! Jon. eom.



To: marginmike who wrote (29693)5/10/1999 6:24:00 PM
From: Valueman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Here are the specs for the QCP-860(dual mode):

With the internal battery(weighing 4.23 ounces):
2.5 hour talk, 3-4 days(72-96 hour) standby

With the slim external:
6 hours talk, 10 days(240 hour) standby

With the extended external:
10 hours talk, 17 days standby

The batteries are able to be added or taken off at any time, even while talking(hot swappable).

Nokia compares with 3.75 hour talk, 115 hour standby, weighing 50% more, costing twice as much(as far as we can tell now).

There you have it. My intent was to assure myself that Q could sell all the phones it made, just as they do now. They will easily do that.




To: marginmike who wrote (29693)5/10/1999 8:57:00 PM
From: DTA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
marginmike,

I too spent some time today in a nearby BAM--the experts there had no idea when the Thin Phone was due in. They did tell me that the QCP 820 was by far their best selling item, far outpacing the Startac. Given what I heard other employees telling new customers, I would be surprised if the Thin Phone isn't a huge seller: the BAM staff was extremely positive about Q.

regards,

DTA