Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark silvers who wrote (19080)	5/10/1999 11:56:00 PM
From: Carlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Don't you think that this is all mysteriously related? For business reasons someone high up at Ledoux probably said "its time to ditch Naxos. Figure out how to do it." So maybe at least one or two loyal worker bees complied. Among other things, we hear about sloppy lab protocol, failure or resistance in following Naxos's precise instructions, contaminated equipment and opening COC containers before accountable witnesses are available,etc. I just have to wonder if all of these "accidents" were indeed accidents. In some analytical settings it's pretty easy to make lab results fail if a complicated protocol is required, especially if the science is new and the many testing condition ranges are not all validated before hand. People knowledgeable about PM testing may very well no how to "beat the system" and cause the results to swing in one direction or another.