Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (7818)	5/10/1999 11:55:00 PM
From: Enigma	Respond to of 17770

If you can't comment on the content - denigrate - easier than thinking? dd

To: Les H who wrote (7818)	5/11/1999 12:31:00 AM
From: D. Long	Respond to of 17770

<<Enough Chomsky. He's not much better than Lyndon Larouche>> LOLOLOLOL!! LaRouche! LOLOLOL! I made the mistake of surfing over to his organization's website once for sick kicks. I read some of the drivel they published, especially one speech his wife gave in Mexico. Mrs. Zepp-LaRouche's speech was just too much, I couldnt keep my mouth shut. Amongst other things, she claimed that John Locke was the father of Statism and the enemy of western christian civilization, and then proceeded to attribute the principles of liberalism to Liebnitz (Liebniz????? She claims his philosophy was the foundation of the American Revolution and the US Constitution as well LOLOLOL) and Confucious. She also claimed, at one point, that Bertrand Russell was a puppetmaster that advocated nuclear annhilation and the rule of the West by nuclear terror (that much is laughable by itself) and then immediately contradicted herself by claiming that Russell was the mastermind of nuclear disarmament bent on the destruction of the western world. In short, the LaRouches are just plain loony. I wrote them a scathing email, and they had the nerve to look me up and harrass me for several weeks trying to convert me. Quite a bunch they are.