To: Carl R. who wrote (8275 ) 5/11/1999 1:13:00 AM From: B. A. Marlow Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17679
You're right about the IPO frenzy, Carl. And it's gonna get worse. Check out IPOinfo's list of stuff in the IPO pipeline:ipoinfo.com Still, a good company (read "story") always IPOs well. And this era of consolidation will tend to take some names (but not necessarily shares) off of the table. Especially after today's NBCi news (which is sort of convoluted, but fascinating), think it's important we watch the fate of LCOS. If Barry "The Godfather" Diller (USAI) doesn't raise the ante, CBS may come out of the shadows and go after it. At that point, we'd have 3 networks with Net traction (DIS/ABC/SEEK, GE/NBCI and CBS/?) and three wannabees running for cover (TWX, VO/USAI and NWS/FOX), not to mention pure new media players AOL, YHOO/BCST, T/ATHM/XCIT and Vulcan/Charter/GNET who are looking for lunch. Then there's MSFT... AXC should be able to make hay with at least one, maybe several, of these players. Wouldn't bother me at all if there never were an IPO for AXC's Net properties. As long as a strategic partner gets involved with us, we'll benefit handsomely. CNET has become a powerhouse partly on the strength of its basic business model (really excellent) and partly on the strength of its association with NBC, largely through Snap (not to overlook investor Paul Allen as well). Note, it never spun off Snap. So the bottom line is this: Along with great execution, we need two things, 1) capital and 2) association with a strong brand(s). An IPO is but one route among several. In any case, gotta believe Ed B.'s working overtime. Hope we're tweaking sexy technology value-adds, recruiting alligators, building the "Miracle on 57th Street" and assembling snappy acquisitions. We need a large extended family that covers the bases and draws crowds, and we need it now. BAM