Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (19083)	5/11/1999 10:34:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

We ALL have an agenda Tom F. JLA

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (19083)	5/11/1999 1:02:00 PM
From: BobS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Tom F., I agree 100% of your evaluation of Bob Gardner. Since he's been running the show the press releases have been clear, concise, and forthcoming. [With the exception of the Fr. Gregory/AGM fiasco.] I have much more faith in him than I did in JJ. Looking forward, you are correct in saying the article is irrelevant (with a single exception - that is, if Fr. Gregory's efforts somehow reinvolve JJ with the company). I, however, find it personally relevant as I continue to monitor the success (or rather, failure) of the DD companies in their effort to prove the existence, and economic viability, of recoverable PGMs. The Ledoux fiasco with Naxos is another in a series of problematic assays and recoveries that have plagued the DD "industry." Investing in these DD companies has taught me, above all else, that one should invest in these companies to obtain profits from the rise and fall of the stock price based on public speculation rather than from corporate revenue-generating operations. It is my belief that Naxos has existed for many years under this directive, per JJ's design. I won't belabor this point any longer. I divested myself of Naxos shares last fall and therefore don't have the same desire to succeed as many on this board. I believe this allows me to see the situation a little more clearly, but it also feels unjust that I continue to berate the company when I don't even have a vested interest in it. bobs.