Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : LifeOne, Inc. (LONE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: daaan who wrote (525)	5/11/1999 12:43:00 PM
From: Mr. Jens Tingleff	Respond to of 1834

JAWZ, Yup they seem rich right now - Nothing we can do to help them. Any signal of LONE information going out - I'm longing to touch that button again. There have to be a katalyst otherwise it would be unsubstantiated hype. Kr Jens

To: daaan who wrote (525)	5/12/1999 7:27:00 AM
From: stockster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1834

If we didn't know better, we would think that TK would be a great credit facility to obtain funds. Makes me want to barf! It's amazing that they can have a seat on the Toronto Exchange when they are the biggest bunch of crooks. JAWZ had better watch TK. They cannot say they do not know how these guys operate as there are enough companies suing TK to raise a red flag. Stockster

To: daaan who wrote (525)	5/12/1999 6:28:00 PM
From: walleye	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1834

After a bit of research on the arbitration process.... If I have this right, we're waiting for financial reports and perhaps more importantly the arbitrators decision regarding the debenture debacle. The arbitration was most likely written into the original contract between LONE and TK. If I understand the arbitration process correctly, there really is no appeal process. The only time a court would get involved is to validate an award. If the award was a result of corruption, fraud or other "undue means", the arbitrator exhibited bias or corruption, the arbitrator refused to postpone, hear pertinent evidence, or acted otherwise to substantially prejudice the rights of one party, or the arbitrator exceeded his powers, a court of law could throw the arbitration decision out. In regards to the bases for setting aside an award, there must be more than simple mistakes in judgement. Each requires some "bad faith" on the part of the arbitrator. The court would not look at the merits of the underlying dispute, or add/subtract from the remedies provided by the award. The court's role on an "appeal" would be to simply examine the arbitration process to determine if it was fair. So there should be no lengthy appeals process. Here's to brighter days for LONE. BE HAPPY, WALLEYE