Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Newbridge Networks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pat mudge who wrote (11428)	5/11/1999 12:39:00 PM
From: Robert	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18016

If you can't deliver product, THAT's a problem you don't want to have. Customers will eventually look elsewhere. In spite of all the stated growth, the stock has gapped down again. Another group of investors have been slammed. Let me ask you, and the other long term posters on this thread (the ones that have held all through the ups and downs). Have you made a lot of money? Put everything else aside, and ask if you would have been better investing elsewhere...R

To: pat mudge who wrote (11428)	5/11/1999 12:40:00 PM
From: Doug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18016

Anyone: During the last cc, NN said they needed 2Q's to address the problem of Back end loaded orders which resulted in a current shortfall. Many new Investors want to know if current estimates of revenues and Income for the next 2Q's will be met or affected. If they were no risks in meeting these forward estimates,the mention of problem fixing and a 2Q time frame at the CC does not seem very relevant. If there are risks and the estimates for the next 2Q's are in jeopardy too, then reference to 2Q's is much more logical. Perhaps someone with better Business acumen could give us a more transparent appreciation of what to expect the next 2 Q's.