Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (38011)	5/11/1999 1:44:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Great point -- let's hear the other side answer THAT one!

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (38011)	5/11/1999 10:44:00 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

<<Close enough to a black hole - 1+1 is actually 1.9something.>> Is that really true in some meaningful sense? I mean... wouldn't it mean something like that the ones shrank, and so weren't ones at all any more, so naturally they didn't add up to the old pre-shrinkage two? As you can see, I am not mathematical. But I mean the question seriously.