SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (22521)5/11/1999 2:04:00 PM
From: t2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Morgan, It appears that MSFT is pushing the pedal to the metal
but have their car is in Park. As soon as that case is resolved (or appears to be resolving), I think it will accelerate like hell.
I have been trading MSFT as well, selling some today to possibly buy back later today or in a few days.



To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (22521)5/11/1999 3:26:00 PM
From: RTev  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
I just ran across an academic analysis of the Microsoft trial that is worthwhile reading for almost anyone interested in the trial. Almost anyone. Some should be warned that -- although it attempts to take a balanced look at the trial -- the paper is written by an academic who clearly believes there is value in antitrust laws and in their enforcement. For those who just can't stomach such a view, I will put a palate-cleansing link at the bottom of this message.

The Importance of the Microsoft Case
antitrustinstitute.org

The author, Albert A. Foer, is president of the American Antitrust Institute. Before answering the question posed in the paper's title, he presents a series of scenarios -- of "possible futures" -- that might come about as a result of the trial and then assigns a probability to each. This is a futurist technique that was much talked about in the old Wired magazine, and will be familiar to its readers.

Here are the six scenarios he presents:

(1) Microsoft Won! Competition Reigns!
or (2) Microsoft Won! The Monopoly from Hell Entrenched!
or (3) Microsoft Won! Now We Have the Oligopoly from Heck!
or (4) The Government Won a Pyrrhic Victory!
or (5) The Government Prevailed! Remedy a Loser!
or (6) The Government Prevailed! Competition Reigns!


He assigns a 1 in 3 likelihood to the first triad of scenarios and a 2 in 3 chance (obviously) to the second triad. And his conclusion to this scenario setting:

I set the probabilities as 1 out of 6 that the Government will win but the remedy will be a loser and 1 out of 2 that the Government will win and the remedy achieves a substantial increase in competition. Note that in my reading of the future, if the Government wins, the probabilities of getting a satisfactory remedy are 75%, whereas if Microsoft wins, the probability of competition asserting itself is only 25%.

Many here will not like that conclusion, but even so, it's worth looking at the scenarios he sets. As he points out, Microsoft investors may lose in the long run even if some variation of the "Micrsoft wins" scenarios plays out. His argument is that Microsoft investors could also win in the end if a variation of the other triad comes to pass.

Foer proposes -- almost as an aside -- a fascinating way to deal with the remedy phase of the trial:

...I would like to see Judge Jackson rule only on liability and propose a general rather than detailed remedy. At that point, he could certify his opinion to the appellate courts for an interlocutory decision. Only after there is a final holding of liability (which spells out what wrongs must be righted) does it make sense to focus in detail on the remedy.
---

Here, as promised is a view from a different side of the trust-buster's ideological divide:
cato.org



To: Sir Francis Drake who wrote (22521)5/11/1999 5:12:00 PM
From: Sir Francis Drake  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
If you want to be really bearish on MSFT, you could look to Philip Morris as a guide to what can happen.

While there are significant differences between the Big Tobacco situation and MSFT, you would be surprised at the number of similarities.

If MSFT loses badly, you could see the same kind of nightmare lawsuit quagmire that tobacco companies find themselves in. First the DOJ will get their licks in - putting in penalties, restrictions etc. like MO, like MSFT. Then the accumulated greed and feeding frenzy at the state level, already states are lining up like vultures - like MO, like MSFT. Then class action and even individual lawsuits, some already have been filed ("I had Windows foisted on me, blah, blah, blah" "refunds" - first they are dismissed, then they start winning,), like MO, like MSFT. Legal proceedings in other countries (not only EU, but individual European countries and Japan are looking at MSFT), like MO, like MSFT. When there is blood in the water, after MSFT loses to the DOJ, the feeding frenzy will bring out every shark and opportunist - and you'll see how a vulnerable giant can be savaged.

You may say - that will never happen, we have laws etc. Don't be so sure. We've had "surgeon general" warnings on cig packs for 35 years and yet you get juries award smokers awards that defy common sense and devalue individual responsibility. "But big tobacco has compromising papers which show illegal intent". Guess what - the DOJ is doing a great job of finding the same kind of compromising papers (or in the case of high-tech MSFT, e-mails). And don't take refuge in thinking big tobacco has the public opinion against it. The PR war waged against MSFT has been very effective. More and more "common people", not just industry insiders or competitors see MSFT as the evil empire. The longer this goes on, the more damage will be done.

And you cannot take refuge in the idea that MSFT is soooo profitable etc., that investors will overlook the liabilities. MO once upon a time, was the bluest of blue chips. Tremendous returns for investors. As good if not better staying power than MSFT's monopoly - selling an extremely addictive drug, that at least 25% of the population finds impossible to resist - with worldwide markets. And with beer, food and other businesses, a well diversified company. MO's business fundamentals have not worsened - one could even argue that nicotine is harder to kick than Windows 9x <ggg>.

And yet, the tremendous liabilities, liabilities that are virtually unlimited in a practical sense, overwhelm MO's strong business value (with RN, investors actually value the tobacco part of their business not just as zero, but as NEGATIVE - in other words, you could get the whole company for the price of it's nontobacco parts, and at a discount to boot). Look at the chart of MO - they have gone NOWHERE for a long time now.

You may think this scenario far-fetched. But the way tobacco has been dragged through a nightmare lasting years, and years, and years is a very real possibility for MSFT. Years of litigation, never ending. And don't fool yourself that somehow MSFT can lobby it's way out of this. If anything, the tobacco lobby is one of the strongest ever, plus they have a natural constituency with tobacco farmers, senators from certain states etc. MSFT can't match those advantages.

And MSFT is in an industry where you need to be on your toes at all times, or you can face extinction. MO is not in that situation. Thus, MSFT can not afford to be distracted by years of legal battles, which MO can handle.

My point is not that MSFT will *necessarily* share the same fate. Rather, I want to point out just how serious the situation is for MSFT. This trial is a great danger to MSFT. And MSFT's reaction has not been reassuring. First they underestimated the danger. Then they mounted a catastrophically incompetent defense.

If the day comes, that big institutions abandon MSFT stock, the same way they abandoned MO (sure there are always some who remain loyal) - you will see MSFT price flounder very, very badly.

The trial is a tremendous negative for MSFT. The longer it goes, the worse it will get (that's why looking to last year's appreciation in the face of the DOJ, is misguided). The day may come, when suddenly the street loses faith in MSFT. And that would be devastating to MSFT shareprice, especially that its p/e is rather lofty.

Bottom line - I believe the trial is a very strong factor in MSFT current price, and will continue to be a stronger and stronger factor the longer it goes on. I disagree vehemently with those who dismiss the impact of the trial on MSFT's shareprice.