Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Walter Morton who wrote (3943)	5/11/1999 2:27:00 PM
From: Joe Copia	Respond to of 18366

Walter, In real life you may be a decent person .. but in cyber space you are a butthead, schizo, arrogant, sometimes intelligent and just plain stupid. Joe PTG&LI !!!

To: Walter Morton who wrote (3943)	5/11/1999 2:30:00 PM
From: sdr	Respond to of 18366

WM- you did not post directly to me you posted to all of us JIM and I simply chose to call a spade a spade

To: Walter Morton who wrote (3943)	5/11/1999 2:37:00 PM
From: chris431	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

Walter & I have shared equal skepticism over certain issues in the past & I have often sided with Walter. It is understandable where Walter is coming from. None the less, Walter, it has come to a point that your many, quick pointed, posts have become annoying rather than inquisitive or informational. Most of your blurbs as of late could have been combined in one post along with your reasoning. Rather than contribute in such a positive manner you have instead decided to post stories that suggest your current stance. Over & over & over. I agree with much of your skepticism as you certainly know from reading my posts. Yet, clicking through unreasoned & repetitive posts no longer succeeds in getting your point across. Rather, people have became annoyed and your legitimacy starts to fade. Walter, voice your skepticism. But do so in a reasoned manner. Those of us who have been on this thread for a long time know that you can do such. In fact, it is this aspect I become annoyed with. You ask rhetorical questions that I know you can answer. Yet, you post 3,4, maybe 6 posts of the same type of articles suggesting your point, rather than listing the articles & then answering your own skeptical comments. Best regards, Chris