SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: HairBall who wrote (13578)5/11/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 99985
 
YUM down on Chinese rioting

U.S. Companies in China Lie Low
By Joe Mcdonald
Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, May 11, 1999; 12:18 p.m. EDT

SHANGHAI, China (AP) -- Kentucky Fried Chicken outlets were closed because of damage by protesters, while an investment conference in Beijing was called off. A bomb threat to an American company emptied an office building.

Worried U.S. companies canceled public activities Monday and foreign
employees tried to stay out of sight. While many said violent anti-American protests won't affect long-term plans to do business in China, others worried that already slowing foreign investment could be
hurt.

Among the casualties was a high-level meeting between state-owned
China Construction Bank and U.S. investment house Goldman Sachs and
Co., canceled after the Chinese couldn't guarantee security.

''If this continues, it will be negative for investor sentiment,'' Fang Xinghai, a Construction Bank executive, told Dow Jones Newswires.

A Goldman Sachs spokesman in Hong Kong, however, said the company
had not canceled or postponed any meetings. ''Our meetings with our
Chinese clients are going ahead as scheduled,'' said the spokesman, who refused to be named.

Companies with distinctly American identities were targeted by protesters angry at NATO's bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia.

Kentucky Fried Chicken said three of its restaurants in the southern city of Changsha and one in Hefei in the east were closed after extensive damage Sunday by protesters.

A restaurant in the western city of Xi'an closed after police warned they couldn't control protesters outside, said Tony Chan, a spokesman in Shanghai for Tricom Global Restaurants Ltd., which owns 310 Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants and 40 Pizza Huts in China.

''None of the Pizza Huts has been attacked. Maybe they think it's Italian,'' Chan said.

Three of the 54 McDonald's restaurants in Beijing closed Sunday ''for the safety of the staff and customers,'' but reopened Monday, said Mayee Tang, a McDonald's spokeswoman in Hong Kong.

The company is looking into reports of vandalism at its other outlets, Tang said.

In Shanghai, police evacuated a building Monday that houses foreign
companies after a bomb threat was telephoned to Connell Bros. Co. Ltd., a San Francisco-based trading firm. Other tenants include Budweiser Brewing Co. Ltd. and the British Council, a government cultural agency.

A bomb squad searched the building, found nothing and reopened it after about three hours. Connell closed its office for the rest of the day.

Harrington Johnson, managing director of Connell Bros. in Hong Kong,
said he suspected the company was targeted because its name in Chinese
is ''American Mutual Benefit Company.''

Despite security fears, both China and its foreign investors have strong incentives to keep doing business.

China is counting on their money to fuel growth in its slowing economy. Foreign-backed companies already produce nearly half of Chinese exports, and they are creating thousands of jobs at a time of massive layoffs at state industries. Foreign firms invested $46 billion in China last year alone.

Beijing is also eagerly trying to join the World Trade Organization, offering concessions to win admission and draw in more investment.

Negotiations on China's entry suffered an immediate setback over the
demonstrations. A U.S. government decision Monday to cancel all official travel to China because of security concerns postponed the planned arrival next weekend of U.S. trade negotiators.

Despite clashing with Washington over Yugoslavia, Beijing has been
eagerly courting U.S. business. It is cracking down on illegal fees charged by local governments, and publicizing steps to improve investment conditions.

''Right now, foreign investors are lying low. We have to wait and see
what the total impact is,'' said Kevin Young, a partner with PriceCoopersWaterhouse in Beijing. ''Things may settle down in a couple of days.''

Myron Brilliant, manager for Asia of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in
Washington, D.C., said he has talked to U.S. businesses in China in
recent days, and ''while companies are on alert, most companies believe this won't have a lasting impact for them.''

Large U.S. companies did business Monday, but many American employees stayed home. An advisory by the U.S. State Department said Americans working in China should avoid crowds if they had to go out in public.

Richard Dore, a spokesman for Hughes Electronics, which has a small
staff in Beijing that doesn't include any Americans, said the company has issued a policy discouraging any American staff from traveling to China.

''There would have to be an extremely good reason to go,'' he said. ''It would have to an extremely critical trip to go out there.''

In Beijing, the International Financial Conference, a nonprofit group of top U.S. bankers who meet annually to discuss financial issues related to U.S. banking, canceled a conference Monday and American participants flew home, organizers said.

Officials of the Chinese central bank and government-owned Bank of
China had been scheduled to speak at the event.




To: HairBall who wrote (13578)5/11/1999 4:03:00 PM
From: Compadre  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99985
 
LG: The sell signal got bumped up to 2181.

Regards,

Jaime



To: HairBall who wrote (13578)5/11/1999 7:44:00 PM
From: J Krnjeu  Respond to of 99985
 
Mr. LG,

Ramsey Su: **OT** Quite frankly I am tired of listening to the Chinese bellyache about the bombing. It was a stupid tragic mistake, period.
I think the Chinese government needs to let its people know, that the American Government has apologized, many times. And, most likely we will pay reparations.

I don't think the American people or its government needs to grovel at the feet of the Chinese over this. You can bet if this happened in reverse, they would not be so quick to apologize to us. And you get bet money the US would never see any repartions.


You go guy!!! Say it as it is!!

Thank You

JK



To: HairBall who wrote (13578)5/11/1999 8:42:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
The most disconcerting thing today was the statement by Cohen, Secretary of Defense, about possible repercussions with trade between China and the U.S. if these protestations spun out of control. Latest at stratfor.com .

Also from the Seattle Times,

Watch how the Chinese use the NATO
bombing

THE very public show of contrition by the Central Itelligence
Agency is a measure of how rattled Washington is over the
Belgrade bombing fiasco.

The CIA, often wrong and never humble, relied on outdated maps
to target a B-2 Stealth bombing mission that destroyed the
Chinese embassy. Three persons were killed and a score
wounded by satellite-guided bombs.

Immediate political damage control included a midnight Saturday
visit to China's embassy in Washington by the U.S. secretary of
state, her key deputy and the vice chair of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff.

Yesterday, the secretary of defense and top CIA officials
blanketed the airwaves with explanations and apologies. These
are rare displays by a superpower that looks something less than
super in the Balkans.

All of the critics of the NATO mission against Serbia have found
their metaphor: crumpled maps in the bomber glove box.
Befuddled allies combined precision weaponry and outdated
information; the embassy moved there in 1996.

China is furious and rightly so. The test, however, is whether
China plays this incident like the country it wants to be, a world
leader that sees events and relationships in a larger context.

Certainly, in the near term, China has every right to exploit its
emotional and political advantage. A resurgence of national fervor
is not unwelcome for a central government anxious about the 10th
anniversary of the Tiananmen Square killings less than a month
away and the deep economic resentments that tarnish the golden
anniversary of the 1949 revolution.

The bombing gives China a reprieve from global headlines about
stealing U.S. nuclear secrets and ongoing tensions from
extraordinary trade surpluses. Negotiations for entry into the
World Trade Organization may get a subtle boost. But Beijing did
not tell its citizens for days that the bombing was an accident and
kept repeating it was a deliberate attack. U.S. apologies also
were withheld from ordinary citizens by the state-controlled
media.

China's anger is understandable. U.S. behavior under similar
attacks has been to launch cruise missiles. Distinctions between
terrorist accidents and grievous mistakes sound silly at this point.

The destruction of the Chinese embassy may force a sober review
of how the war against Serbia and Slobodan Milosevic is waged
and by whom.

At the same time, China and the U.S. must keep reminding one
another of the larger stakes and the budding constructive
relationship that is in jeopardy.



To: HairBall who wrote (13578)5/11/1999 10:05:00 PM
From: Peter Yang  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 99985
 
OT:
>>You can bet if this happened in reverse, they would not be so
quick to apologize to us. And you get bet money the US would never see any repartions.<<

You're probably right. If this happened in reverse, the US would send cruise missiles over to bomb the hell out of the country who attacked a US embassy.

The attack was intentional and was done probably behind the back of the US admin. The reasons:
1) Chinese embassy moved to that place a few years ago. Even AAA updates its maps annually. How can you believe CIA, which is supposed to be best intelligence agency in the world, would make this mistake.
2) If CIA or NATO don't do their own research, they could get on the internet to get the accurate street map through Yahoo or AOL.
3) The timing of the bombing is very interesting - right after Russia and G7 were ready to cut a deal with Yogoslavia government. Rumor on the street is some people in the military hate Clinton so much and also don't want to see a peace deal that might not be regarded as a total victory for NATO, i.e, they intended to sabotage the peace negotiation by boombing Chinese embassy.
4) Sent a warning message to Chinese government because since the begining of the war, Chinese government has been on the Yogoslavia side.