To: Teresa Lo who wrote (10734 ) 5/11/1999 9:04:00 PM From: Herm Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14162
The dialog has been pretty good the past two weeks. Lots of new ideas, plenty of helping, and sharing. I'm trying to digest your subjective point of view. I do notice that you have been hyperlinking to the same web site which is your home turf. By the way, what is your real name? I do have to comment on your points. It peeks my attention when "experience people" in the brokerage business come online with overtones of "you guys are doing it all wrong" and not illustrate in writing and by example more than their words! That is not fair and an unproductive use of this opportunity. Your Point #1. As you know, there many ways to trade options and stocks to make money. The "pros" each have their own tool shed of things that work for them at certain times. And, we would love to hear from them and pick their brains. Staying on the forum's theme of covered call writing, according to McMillan,"option traders have two MAIN ways of trading. The first is to predict the price of the underlying stock - directional trading. The second is to take a initially neutral position based on option implied volatility - volatility trading. The profit is made when extreme moves are made. We (the regular lurkers) clearly have been successfully applying CCing to make money in the stock market. We are applying the first approach which is to predict the stock price using the BB, RSI, etc. along with the fundamentals. We have not had an expert discuss the other method. Now, when I have people who have indicated thru private email that they are trading upwards of $275,000 accounts and CCing was part of their "tool shed" and to keep up the good dialog and forum, I have to wonder where you are coming from. It may not be your style, but, there is a valid place for this type of trading for many novices and "pros." Your Point #2. Because writing CC violates the central principle behind long term success in the market Man, that is REALLY a bias opinion. Every one of your points of the old CC dogma have been addressed in the WINs approach which is basically a summary of 9,000 post on the topic. Now, individuals on the forum do tweak here and there! But, my friend, I don't hear too many readers say that they are not making money on this forum. In fact, they indicate they are making more now than previous experience with ex "brokerage professionals" advice. Now, I notice you do S&P trading. So, you must know the pro named George Angell. In his book entitled, "Sure Thing Options Trading," in chapter #4, page 83 he writes,"Over time, the writing side of the option equation is apt to produce the most consistent and reliable profits." Stock options is akin to betting against the house in Las Vegas, the selling, or writing, of listed stock options is akin to being the house in Las Vegas, booking the bets of eager gamblers all looking to make a score. When was the last time you heard of a casino going out of business if they know what they are doing? In closing, . In a way, they are assuming the burden of holding all the paper and exposing themselves to capital losses while holding out for small gains in income. Like I said, we have a proper response for that possibility. I don't lose sleep when I know I have my CCer's premies in my account. As for long term capital gains? Heck, having a short term tax gain problem is a very nice problem to have in this country. It's like instant gratification! :-)