Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (9806)	5/11/1999 7:23:00 PM
From: Gottfried	Respond to of 10072

Rocky, I've started to read your posts again because I enjoy the laughs. Please keep posting. :) Gottfried

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (9806)	5/11/1999 8:17:00 PM
From: Herb Fuller	Respond to of 10072

Re:>>> Don't be too surprised if they tell you something to the effect that the lawsuit has been dropped. (due to Lack of any merit)<<< Yea-- we know , Iomega paid some $9 Million for the right to let Castlewood build and market the URP drive at Syquests expense. If Iomega doesn't pursue Syquest's lawsuit, against Castlewood, it will be because the technology is obsolete and Iomega will have a 4-5 gig removable drive out on the market soon . The above being the case, Castlewood would have to spend a pile of $ to get to the next level and URP2 will sell for $600+ in order to recoup their R&D costs. Herb