Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: findstock who wrote (27948)	5/11/1999 10:45:00 PM
From: FREAKAZOID	Respond to of 44908

0.253 5000 0.257 5000 0.253 5000 0.257 5000 5/11/99 15:28 0.253 10000 5/11/99 15:32 0.257 5000 5/11/99 15:33 0.253 5000 5/11/99 15:36 0.257 5000 5/11/99 15:41 0.253 2000 5/11/99 15:46 0.257 10000 5/11/99 15:49 0.257 5000 5/11/99 15:52 0.253 30000 5/11/99 16:10 0.255 5000

To: findstock who wrote (27948)	5/11/1999 11:06:00 PM
From: cicak	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Hi findstock - <<Wow, I can see that many of the TSIG'ers have moved on not only probably the stock but this thread as well....>> We're here. Just taking a break. :~) Regards, phil.com

To: findstock who wrote (27948)	5/12/1999 5:23:00 AM
From: Gordon Owen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Suppose TSIG declares a "dividend" of a music card for each 10,000 shares. Cost would be minimal: printing and postage. One result would be sales from those most likely to buy: us! Another possibility: several posters have noted large block sells near end of day and, last week, an apparently unlimited supply at ask of 33 cents so that huge demand and resulting volume somehow didn't cause ask to go up. Could be an unethical MM shorting with no intention to cover the short. (Please, no posts on "you can't short a BB." You can't, and I can't, but MMs can and it's even legitimate if they cover. Trouble is, they're not regulated even by self-regulation like NASD.) Could someone knowledgeable in the mechanics of such things address whether the process of distributing a "dividend" would identify any holders of "phantom shares" bought from an MM who was simply putting the 33 cents in his pocket?