SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ECNC: BETTING, INC. A WAGER ON NEW GAMING TECHNOLOGY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DaiTN who wrote (2054)5/12/1999 9:02:00 AM
From: Jorjenzak  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2909
 
no...here is the same old info shown.

13-Month Form 4 and 144 History

InsiderName Rel # of
Shares Trans
Type Trans Date(s) Trans Price(s) Total
Holdings Share
Type D/I
Own Input
Date
GIAMBRUNO, RICHARD S. 250,000 144 04/23/99
CLINTON, JAMES S. B/O 7,500 S 02/23/99 0.57 2,008,500 COM D 03/10/99
CLINTON, JAMES S. B/O 10,000 S 01/29/99 0.57 2,016,000 COM D 02/11/99

BTW...not to be negative but I have been canvassing several of the more reputed names on SI about their opinion on BETT and have received a mixed bag of responses. Most looked at it early on but have since lost interest.

One impression I have gotten is that lofty PR's are nice but results are all that will get this baby moving. Many an OTC has come out and projected millions in earnings. Projecting is not enough, reporting actual earnings which point towards substantiating a projection is better and actual earnings meeting the projection is the ultimate that can blow this thing wide open. Completed acquisitions are a great start. Next BETT has to show something from these buys, as in earnings and eventually profit. Only then will we get the respect we deserve and the price that reflects the value of this company and its vision. It will just take time. Solid growth on fundamentals beats the hell out of a false spike on speculation and hype. JMHO

GO BETT!!!