SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jane4IceCream who wrote (13741)5/12/1999 2:06:00 PM
From: Jack Colton  Respond to of 25548
 
All right, all right!

Ladies and Losers, let's conduct this verbal sparring in proper order.
Ladies, take the right corner, Loser take the wrong corner.

Put your gloves on, no hitting below the belt, and have a fair fight!

Jack Holster



To: Jane4IceCream who wrote (13741)5/12/1999 2:06:00 PM
From: Hound  Respond to of 25548
 
Hi Jane,
Might be the wrong time to say it but Happy Belated Birthday .



To: Jane4IceCream who wrote (13741)5/12/1999 2:53:00 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
The onus is on you.

Au contraire, dear Jane. I'm not the one claiming (for years!) great assays, stockpiled ore, revenue-producing oil properties, "major" telecom subsidiary, silver properties, JVs and buyouts, 60M short shares, "imminent" reporting, $20 stock price, etc etc etc, blah blah blah. I never claimed any of that! All that and more was claimed by the hypesters on this and older threads. With the help of IR who is being compensated with a dump-truck load of stock and an insider who got nailed by the courts for $3M for certain "irregularities".

Let's see these claims backed up with audited financials for NPEC/MDIN/MDHM. That's all it would take to make this all the anguish go away. Or, you can simply state that you aren't buying the company because of its business prospects, you're buying it because you believe in its ability to hype itself. Which is fine. But at least be open about it.



To: Jane4IceCream who wrote (13741)5/12/1999 3:27:00 PM
From: marcos  Respond to of 25548
 
"The onus is on you." - rofl aargh ... nauseat emptor.

Jane, i can't believe you said that.