Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter V who wrote (1024)	5/12/1999 3:07:00 PM
From: Bob Trocchi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Peter V... RE: ALTIF I loved the nice polite way they can explain their losses. >>Principal factors contributing to the losses during these periods were the absence of revenue together with the incurrence of operating expenses. << Don't you love the wording...absence and incurence! Cheers Bob T.

To: Peter V who wrote (1024)	5/13/1999 5:24:00 AM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

<<<"deferred exploration expenditure?">>> Theory: Executives grabbed a few twenties out of petty cash and went searching for strip joints. Not finding any in Cody, Wyoming, they decided to pocket the loot until one opens in the area, at which time they will book the expense as fast as they can stuff it down a g-string. The ALTIF stock fraud will eventually trade at zero and should never be covered.