SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yogizuna who wrote (13679)5/12/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: spesk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
In a day where the decline of political power is taking place all over the world, a country's stability and moral balance will stand in it's place. on both economic and moral grounds, America's rise hasn't peaked....



To: Yogizuna who wrote (13679)5/12/1999 5:31:00 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
**OT** Yogi, if you want to be paranoid, be my guest. while i agree that some form of subtle oppression can be detected even in the most upstanding democracies, there is no denying that a pluralistic society is the most desirable to live in. in china, we just would not have the debate we're having now. as to the real reason behind the war against serbia, i already said in my first reply to you that this is the west imposing it's will on one of the major cultural fault-lines in the world (islam/orthodox and catholic christianity), that happens to border the western sphere of influence and interest. peace has to be forced upon the region, it is a geopolitical must, otherwise we'd continue to live with a powderkeg that could blow up in our faces anytime. btw, i am quite happy with the U.S. enjoying sole superpower status, i have absolutely no yearning for the cold war state of affairs. and yes, we decide who gets saved. it is just not possible to save everybody, so the people living in strategically important spots take precedence i guess. of course this is far from ideal, i'm just trying to be realistic. with regards to china, it should be engaged diplomatically and economically, but as long as the communist party dictatorship is in charge there, it is still basically the enemy.
i am prepared to concede that NATO's strategy leaves a lot to be desired, but i think the kosovars would have fallen victim to milosevic's thugs with or without the bombing. keep in mind that the serbian troops and special police forces were already building up in kosovo long before the bombing campaign started. at least they have now reason to hope that they will be able to go back to their homes(or rather what's left of them) one day. if not for NATO most likely a wider war would already have broken out in the region, involving serbia,macedonia,albania and perhaps even greece and turkey. i have visited all these countries and if there is a trait that's common to the people living there it is that they are all extremely uncompromising. therefore compromise must be forced upon them, lest we want to risk a war that will be very difficult to stop indeed.

regards,

hb