SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: X Y Zebra who wrote (7874)5/12/1999 10:40:00 PM
From: tajen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21876
 
Is LU a "Rule Maker"???

<THE RULE MAKER PORTFOLIO>

Is Wal-Mart a Rule Maker?

by Al Levit (TMF Early)

GLENDALE, CA (May 12, 1999) -- Today, it's my turn to discuss a company that doesn't quite cut it as a Rule Maker, and I've chosen Wal-Mart Stores (NYSE: WMT). With over $137 billion in annual revenues, the Bentonville, Arkansas company is not only the world's largest discount retailer, but the world's largest retailer -- period. The company's everyday low prices, dedicated customer service, friendly "People Greeters," and ultra-efficient distribution make this a retail force to be reckoned with -- but is it a Rule Maker?

When Sam Walton opened the first Wal-Mart store in 1962, a Rule Breaker was born. This top dog and first mover created the discount retail industry and held onto the lead by capitalizing on its visionary leadership and inept competition. The company's well-chronicled business excellence has rewarded shareowners handsomely for decades. Over the past 25 years, the stock has racked up an amazing 34.6% compound annual return (including reinvested dividends). A chart of the stock's performance since 1985 makes the stellar returns of the S&P 500 (represented by the blue line) look downright paltry. Despite all this success, this Rule Breaker never became a Rule Maker -- it's a Merchant King.

To see why the company is not a Rule Maker, please see the Ranker that I posted yesterday. With a total score of 40 points, Wal-Mart barely makes it into Tier 2 status. The story here is the company's poor showing on the financial location metrics. Low gross and net margins, a low cash-to-debt ratio, and a good, but not great, Flow ratio limit the company to only 4 out of 14 possible points. The company's margins simply aren't near our standards, and cash is only 24% of debt. Even the Flowie just barely inches under our 1.25 standard.

Wal-Mart may not be much of a Rule Maker, but a lot of people still think that it's a heckuva great company, including me (I'm a shareholder). With its network of nearly 2,900 Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores, the company delivers high-quality merchandise at outstanding prices to more than 90 million customers each week. The recent experience of my wife is typical. She went shopping at Wal-Mart with her mother for a few items and came back with bags full of stuff we're using every day. Her total bill was over $200.

However, Wal-Mart does not make profits like a Rule Maker. The company is in a low-margin business that requires tight expense control and high asset turnover (see ROE series parts 1, 2, 3, 4 for a good explanation) to put profits on the bottom-line. Despite the company's highly-automated distribution centers and world-class inventory management, the brick-and-mortar stores necessitate a substantial investment in inventory, which prevents the company from achieving an ultra-low Flowie like that of Microsoft or Yahoo!. Also, the retailer uses a fair amount of debt to keep building new stores.

Moreover, unlike Rule Makers such as Microsoft, Cisco, and Pfizer, Wal-Mart doesn't have any legal protection over its business practices and products to keep competitors at bay. If someone else comes in with a chain of stores that do the job better, Wal-Mart has no legal way to stop them. Of course, at this point, duplicating Wal-Mart's thousands of stores and sophisticated distribution system would be extraordinarily difficult. Clearly, the retailer's entrenched position forms a significant barrier to entry by a competitor, but most people would agree that patent protection is an even better barrier. Plus, Wal-Mart is already facing serious competition from Dayton Hudson's (NYSE: DH) "upscale discount" Target Stores and Costco's (Nasdaq: COST) super-efficient wholesale clubs.

A company facing fierce competitors and operating on 3% profit margins can go from profit to loss relatively quickly. On top of that, Wal-Mart sells for a well-deserved high multiple to its current earnings. If those slim profit margins fall significantly, the price of this stock could drop even more sharply. In this situation, the typical Rule Maker plan of buying and holding for 10 years may not guarantee success.

Thus, we see that Wal-Mart's competition-rich industry is not suitable for a Rule-Making investor. It's unclear whether the low-margin retailing business will make money hand over fist for years to come. Then again, Wal-Mart has managed to keep the cash pouring in for decades now. While mutual funds will tell you, "Past performance does not guarantee future returns," strong historical performance isn't a bad sign, either.

What does all this mean for Merchant King Wal-Mart? Personally, I think it's a good investment, but it's certainly not a Rule Maker, and I don't treat it as such in my portfolio. I feel that I need to pay extra-close attention to Wal-Mart's operational performance, especially as it compares to that of its well-run competitors.

In short, compared to most Rule Makers, Wal-Mart carries more risk, but also offers more potential reward.

By the way, the above-linked Ranker does not include Wal-Mart's earnings for the most recent quarter. For a report on those earnings, which beat Wall Street's expectations, see yesterday's Fool Plate Special.

That's all from me today. Tomorrow, Matt will be looking at entertainment giant Time Warner (NYSE: TWX).

Fool on,

Al

Rule Maker Strategy Board
Rule Maker Companies Board
Rule Maker Beginners Board
Rule Maker Spreadsheet (Excel 97, 68k)
Rule Maker Spreadsheet (Excel 95, 41k)

E-mail this article to a friend.

Fools Wanted: Apply Within.

Recent Rule Maker Portfolio Headlines:
05/11/99 Nike Just Hasn't Done It
05/10/99 Mini Mouse
05/07/99 The Foolishness of Laziness
05/06/99 Adding Money on the Dips
05/05/99 A Focus on Portfolio Allocation
Rule Maker Portfolio Archives >>

Order your copy of David and Tom Gardner's new book, Rule Breakers, Rule Makers. This Simon & Schuster beauty has just hit the shelves -- get your copy today! The first half of the epic book, on Rule Breakers, elucidates the Rule Breaker's investment style; the second half, on Rule Makers, further explains Rule Maker investing.

Bookmark Live Rule Maker Port Quotes

05/12/99 Close
Stock Change Bid
AXP -1 13/16 126.00
CHV -3 95.06
CSCO +6 7/8 118.75
EK + 1/2 78.50
GM +2 5/8 88.38
GPS - 5/8 62.25
INTC + 3/16 62.50
KO - 7/16 66.44
MSFT + 5/8 80.50
PFE +1 3/16 115.75
SGP + 1/2 49.31
TROW + 7/16 39.94
XON -2 9/16 79.06
YHOO -4 1/16 169.94



Day Month Year History
R-MAKER +0.47% -0.48% 11.54% 41.14%
S&P: +0.62% 2.16% 11.28% 37.64%
NASDAQ: +1.55% 2.50% 18.87% 57.70%

Rule Maker Stocks

Rec'd # Security In At Now Change
2/3/98 48 Microsoft 39.13 80.50 105.70%
6/23/98 34 Cisco Syst 58.41 118.75 103.30%
5/1/98 55 Gap Inc. 34.37 62.25 81.12%
2/13/98 44 Intel 42.34 62.50 47.62%
2/3/98 22 Pfizer 82.30 115.75 40.65%
2/17/99 16 Yahoo Inc. 126.31 169.94 34.54%
5/26/98 18 AmExpress 104.07 126.00 21.08%
2/6/98 56 T. Rowe Pr 33.67 39.94 18.60%
8/21/98 44 Schering-P 47.99 49.31 2.75%
2/27/98 27 Coca-Cola 69.11 66.44 -3.86%

Foolish Four Stocks

Rec'd # Security In At Value Change
3/12/98 20 Eastman Ko 63.15 78.50 24.31%
3/12/98 20 Exxon 64.34 79.06 22.89%
3/12/98 17 General Mo 72.41 88.38 22.06%
3/12/98 15 Chevron 83.34 95.06 14.06%

Rule Maker Stocks

Rec'd # Security In At Value Change
6/23/98 34 Cisco Syst 1985.95 4037.50 $2051.55
2/3/98 48 Microsoft 1878.45 3864.00 $1985.55
5/1/98 55 Gap Inc. 1890.33 3423.75 $1533.42
2/13/98 44 Intel 1862.83 2750.00 $887.17
2/3/98 22 Pfizer 1810.58 2546.50 $735.92
2/17/99 16 Yahoo Inc. 2020.95 2719.00 $698.05
5/26/98 18 AmExpress 1873.20 2268.00 $394.80
2/6/98 56 T. Rowe Pr 1885.70 2236.50 $350.80
8/21/98 44 Schering-P 2111.7 2169.75 $58.05
2/27/98 27 Coca-Cola 1865.89 1793.81 -$72.08

Foolish Four Stocks

Rec'd # Security In At Value Change
3/12/98 20 Eastman Ko 1262.95 1570.00 $307.05
3/12/98 20 Exxon 1286.70 1581.25 $294.55
3/12/98 17 General Mo 1230.89 1502.38 $271.49
3/12/98 15 Chevron 1250.14 1425.94 $175.80

CASH $70.09
TOTAL $33958.47

Note: The Rule Maker Portfolio began with $20,000 on February 2, 1998, and it adds $2,000 in cash (which is soon invested in stocks) every six months.



To: X Y Zebra who wrote (7874)5/13/1999 9:29:00 AM
From: X Y Zebra  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21876
 
World Telecommunication Fans Learn From English and Dutch Soccer Fanimals.

DISNEY WORLD, May 12 (Snot Time News) - The rabid fanaticism usually attributed to Soccer "fanimals" (and religious zealots), has now spilled to the world of telecommunications, evidenced by the recent war of words between the various Internet thread participants who support their corresponding favorite telecom companies.

Lately, the fashionable practice of inundating the opposing thread with news relevant to the competing enterprise has escalated to the point of absurdity.

Fundamental principles of investment are thrown away, discarded as "useless and irrelevant concepts". Usually cool minded and logical based engineering minds have been exploding into temper tantrums of absurd counter-existentialism, passionately seeking yellow journalism, sometimes leading to irrelevant news clips.

The readers, (mostly composed of timid, or rather quiet lurkers), are left puzzled scratching their heads, (to the point of creating a bald spot), and asking themselves: "what's the point"?

However, the warring parties, primarily schizophrenic engineers, (probably rejects from some Architecture school, lacking "artistic flair"), engaged in mindless exchange of news clips with the same religious zeal of a bomb throwing Ayatohla Arsahola.

Their main leaders have been identified, (amongst many), as: "The Cisco Kid", "Lucretia Mc Evil", "Nortie the Viking", "Noki-a The Flying Finn", "Arscencio Hawll", and other minor schizos.

The State Department has been contacted to see if they would influence NATO to "accidentally on purpose" deviate a few bombs in the direction of the Telecom Terrorists. The State Department in typical bureaucratic style, have ignored these pleas, claiming mental retardation. (a consistent follow-up to earlier bombing decisions).