SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yousef who wrote (58015)5/13/1999 2:27:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 1573092
 
MakeIt: <that is correct ... 1GHZ is faster than 600Mhz. However, We
were talking about the K6-3 ...>

Wow! What I hear? Is it you, old Yousef?
Was it you who tried not long ago
to convince investors that the process is
everything, and microarchitecture is nothing?
Why would it suddenly appears to you that
K7 is somewhat different from K6-3?

Remember your "tiny architecture things <ggg>"?

I am glad you started to learn as least something
here, and relieving yourself little-by-little
from your brain "constipation" problems...

C'mon Yousef, you can make it...



To: Yousef who wrote (58015)5/14/1999 6:07:00 AM
From: Jeff R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573092
 
Youself

Who are you kidding. The 1,000 MHz demonstration
was for the K7.

biz.yahoo.com

"I think it So"



To: Yousef who wrote (58015)5/14/1999 8:47:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573092
 
Yousef,

Do you still believe that AMD's 0.25u process can't get to 400 MHz?

Just curious-
Scumbria