Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : SHAL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: vestor who wrote (687)	5/13/1999 8:52:00 AM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 941

Current investots may be hurt but the facts have given them time to get out while they can. Those that stay will end up paying the price because you have to be blind to think this company is for real. Exposing companies protects future investors from getting hurt and will make insiders pay for their ill-gotten gains. As to the question of if I am paid to bash stocks, the answer is NO!! This is a insult to the Truthseeker. If I was paid I would be as bad as the touts, insiders and manipulators that are pushing this stock. Mr. Krause, why do you continue to claim that these shell deals are IPO's? They clearly are not IPO's. An IPO, by definition is the very first (Initial) offering of stock to the public. If a vehicle is already public, as is the case in a shell, then you are not performing IPOs, you are performing reverse mergers. Statements calling them IPOs are clearly misleading and a lie to investors. Truthseeker

To: vestor who wrote (687)	5/13/1999 8:56:00 AM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 941

Current investors may be hurt but the facts have given them time to get out while they can. Those that stay will end up paying the price because you have to be blind to think this company is for real. Exposing companies protects future investors from getting hurt and will make insiders pay for their ill-gotten gains. As to the question of if I am paid to bash stocks, the answer is NO!! This is a insult to the Truthseeker. If I was paid I would be as bad as the touts, insiders and manipulators that are pushing this stock. Being a Godly man I have to answer to a much higher authority and follow the Bible's golden rule; "Thout shall not lie and should always tell the truth!" Mr. Krause, why do you continue to lie and claim that these shell deals are IPO's? They clearly are not IPO's. An IPO, by definition is the very first (Initial) offering of stock to the public. If a vehicle is already public, as is the case in a shell, then you are not performing IPOs, you are performing reverse mergers. Statements calling them IPOs are clearly misleading and a lie to investors. Truthseeker